-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 14 May 2004, 20:21 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MDP>>> I am now spamcopping any of these that come in. Can I
MDP>>> recommend that others do the same?
MW>> How do I do that?
MDP> Well, if you're not a Spa
Hi Martin,
on Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:16 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MDP>> I am now spamcopping any of these that come in. Can I recommend that
MDP>> others do the same?
MW> How do I do that?
Have a look and sign in at www.spamcop.net
--
Cheers
Peter
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
Winamp curre
Dear Martin,
@14-May-2004, 20:20 Martin Webster [MW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MW>>> Anyway, I just created my first kill filter.
MDP>> I am now spamcopping any of these that come in. Can I
MDP>> recommend that others do the same?
MW> How do I do that?
Well, if you're not a SpamC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 14 May 2004, 12:27 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW>> I'm still getting these from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (an
MW>> auto-responder) on TBUDL. It wouldn't be quite so bad if the
MW>> message states on whose behalf
Dear Martin,
@13-May-2004, 23:20 Martin Webster [MW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> Anyway - treat this as a heads up to any using or thinking of
MDP>> using a C/R service that this will probably be becoming
MDP>> against list rules.
MW> I'm still getting these from [EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 08 May 2004, 15:20 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MDP> Something is occurring that needs a moderator's hand a new rule. We
MDP> will get together and draft the change as time permits, but I feel -
MDP> on beh
Dear Randy,
On 04:59 09.05.2004, you wrote...
> First of all, It's not me. I don't use "RiskFreeMail." I use
> "Mailblocks." Please don't punish ALL Challenge/response spam filter
> services. Some, like Mailblocks, have provisions for handling mailing
> lists and the like, as follows:
[...]
> Mai
On Saturday, May 8, 2004, 3:23:42 PM, Melissa Reese wrote:
M> You recently sent a message to [user's name snipped]
M> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with a subject "[message subject
M> snipped]". To help cope with the ever increasing volume of junk
M> e-mails, I am using RiskFreeMail which has placed your me
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, May 9, 2004, 1:03:10 AM, you wrote:
> I wouldn't punish all C/R systems. Only those that send annoying
> challenge messages. Those messages are sent to trash over here,
> regardless of whether I received it on an ML or a PM account. If
> you want to receive my messages, I wi
Hello Thomas,
> I wouldn't punish all C/R systems. Only those that send annoying
> challenge messages. Those messages are sent to trash over here,
> regardless of whether I received it on an ML or a PM account. If you
> want to receive my messages, I will expect you to put me in your
> whitelist *
Hello minnesotan-TBUDL5831,
On Sat, 08 May 2004 19:59:47 -0700 GMT (09/05/2004, 09:59 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mTmc> First of all, It's not me. I don't use "RiskFreeMail." I use
mTmc> "Mailblocks." Please don't punish ALL Challenge/response spam filter
mTmc> services. Some, like Mailb
Dear Minnesotan-Tbudl5831,
@08-May-2004, 19:59 -0700 (09-May 03:59 UK time)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [MT] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
...
>> --
>> Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
>> TB! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
Point one - watch it with the excessive quotes
ï> Hi T'Buddlers,
Something is occurring that needs a moderator's hand a new rule. We
will get together and draft the change as time permits, but I feel -
on behalf of the list admins (Johannes and myself), that I should
pre-empt it with a direct plea.
Challenge / response spam filter systems look
Hi Marck,
On Saturday, May 08, 2004, at 4:35:56 PM PST, you wrote:
MR>> So...at least in the notices I've been sent from this "service",
MR>> the person using the service is identified (by name, but not by
MR>> email address).
> Erm - not quite. Take this message as an example? I have sent a
> m
Dear Melissa,
@8-May-2004, 13:23 -0700 (08-May 21:23 UK time) Melissa Reese [MR]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>> We have just been made aware of a service called "RiskFreeMail".
>> One of our users is using them to filter mail. We don't know who
>> and can't throw them off the list.
.
Melissa Reese, [MR] wrote:
MR> And who knows?...perhaps a "service" like "RiskFreeMail" could
MR> have its own sinister ulterior motives; collecting email addresses
MR> of those who "click here" to visit the site and enter the "code"?
MR> They may indeed help *their users* in some way, but how do
Hi Marck,
On Saturday, May 08, 2004, at 7:20:15 AM PST, you wrote:
> We have just been made aware of a service called "RiskFreeMail". One
> of our users is using them to filter mail. We don't know who and
> can't throw them off the list.
I've recently (more so now than before) been receiving the
Hi T'Buddlers,
Something is occurring that needs a moderator's hand a new rule. We
will get together and draft the change as time permits, but I feel -
on behalf of the list admins (Johannes and myself), that I should
pre-empt it with a direct plea.
Challenge / response spam filter systems look a
18 matches
Mail list logo
