Hello Batters,
This is obviously a question for RitLabs, but perhaps one of you has
info re whether the release of v. 2 will signify the demise of 1.xx
or whether 2 separate product lines will coexist; one capable of
creating html text and the other, a leaner, meaner one, without that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 19:52:46 -0600, Douglas thoughtfully wrote the
following:
DH This is obviously a question for RitLabs, but perhaps one of you
DH has info re whether the release of v. 2 will signify the demise of
DH 1.xx or whether 2 separate
Saturday, January 06, 2001, 9:10:54 PM, you wrote:
ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM Hash: SHA1
ACM On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 19:52:46 -0600, Douglas thoughtfully wrote the
ACM following:
DH This is obviously a question for RitLabs, but perhaps one of you
DH has info re whether the release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 21:26:37 -0500, David thoughtfully wrote the
following:
ACM AFAIK, the version 1.xx versions will not continue to be
ACM developed after version 2 has been released, as it is with most
ACM other software.
DC That's certainly to
Hello A. others on TBUDL following this thread,
Saturday, January 06, 2001, you stated regarding v. 1.xx versions
not continuing to be developed after version 2 has been released:
ACM What I will not appreciate is an editor that lacks the power of
ACM the present editor, especially with
Hello!
Sunday, January 07, 2001, 7:12:04 AM, Douglas Hinds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACM What I will not appreciate is an editor that lacks the power of
ACM the present editor, especially with regards to text reflowing
ACM and its WYSIWYG nature.
ACM @_@ (Opinions given are mine and not
6 matches
Mail list logo
