-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Monday, May 07, 2001 11:26:09 [ +0800 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Edit received messages':
Thomas> I often want to edit the subject line, because I keep getting messages
Thomas> from airfreight off
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 5:26:09 AM, you wrote:
> (including sending mails to the wrong recipient -
> let's forbid this too!)
Ten points! I want that - now!
--
Best regards,
Jannik Lindquist
1.52/Windows 98 SE (Danish version)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Looks like a plugin error, in as checking past email the characters are
only present when the plugin is used vs: hot-keys.
- --
George Schoelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
iQEVAwUBOvdqezYFY6kvWSq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Isn't this why we use PGP?
- --
George Schoelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
iQEVAwUBOvdpCDYFY6kvWSqxAQHcNAgAxS0R86F7pxx9k04FLQE7LXDRyy2GyUil
+Y1lL7cS+UoVlCD9eTSqXw/qxkXxHA/uhgqTR4KX7bhrmh8RE1+6bWp
t; it /by mistake/. That's a "Good Thing" (tm) in my books :-).
ASH> I totally agree with you on this. It's fine the way it is. Thanks for
ASH> your help. I was getting afraid we were plunging into a controversial
ASH> thread.
Not so fast. ;-) I am in favour of being ab
Hello Marck,
Monday, May 07, 2001, 20:45:01, you wrote:
MDP> Annotating messages is covered by the "Memo" function of TB. Editing
MDP> is a separate issue.
I did not know about the "memo" function. Useful too ... I'm learning
something new every day with TB!
MDP> Where's the problem? TB may no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dwight,
On 07 May 2001 at 13:04:42 -0500 (which was 19:04 where I live)
Dwight A Corrin wrote to Dierk Haasis and made these points:
>> your formatting needs remind me of another way: Export messages as
>> text file and use a word processor.
D
On Monday, May 07, 2001, 12:14:16 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> your formatting needs remind me of another way: Export messages as
> text file and use a word processor.
At least part of the point of doing the editing/annotating in the
original message is to be able to find it in the thread
On Monday, May 07, 2001, 12:04:19 PM, Peter Meyns wrote:
> I think that's not the point. Of course everyone can store their
> messages the way they want. The unethical thing IMHO would be, when
> the message would appear as sent this way by the author. So I find
> it absolutely correct, that TB!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dwight!
On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 1:45:55 PM you wrote:
> I can't imagine what the fact many people think it is unethical to
> edit received messages would have to do with making this useful
> feature available to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
George wrote on 5/7/2001, 2:26 PM:
George> Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for keys
George> or ØbØbX
^^
This is the third time I see random characters appearing in the
signature. In all occasions, taglines and PGP-signi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 14:26 (my local time), George F Schoelles
presented us with these thoughts about "Edit received messages":
T>> No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received messages.
T>> Since a workar
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 May 2001 00:25:17 +0800 (Sun, 06 May 18:25:17 in Copenhagen)
you wrote:
> No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received messages.
> Since a workaround is available (the one you are using), I don't quite
> see the point either. ;-)
The poi
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 May 2001 00:25:17 +0800 (Sun, 06 May 18:25:17 in Copenhagen)
you wrote:
> No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received messages.
> Since a workaround is available (the one you are using), I don't quite
> see the point either. ;-)
The poi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, May 06, 2001, 9:25:17 AM, you wrote:
T> No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received messages.
T> Since a workaround is available (the one you are using), I don't quite
T> see the point either. ;-)
That
On Sunday, May 06, 2001, 11:25:17 AM, Thomas wrote:
ASH>> I'm doing some "Spring Cleaning" in my mailboxes and was
ASH>> wondering if there is a "simple" way to edit received messages.
> No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received mes
Hello Anne-Sophie,
On Sun, 6 May 2001 18:13:34 +0200 GMT (07/05/2001, 00:13 +0800 GMT),
Anne-Sophie Hombert wrote:
ASH> I'm doing some "Spring Cleaning" in my mailboxes and was wondering if
ASH> there is a "simple" way to edit received messages.
No; many people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anne-Sophie,
On 06 May 2001 at 18:13:34 +0200 (which was 17:13 where I live)
Anne-Sophie Hombert wrote to TBUDL and made these points:
ASH> Up to now, I've been using the following: export the message(s) to *.mbx
ASH> format, edit it(them) and
On 06-05-2001 at 18:13, Anne-Sophie Hombert kindly wrote:
> Up to now, I've been using the following: export the message(s) to *.mbx
> format, edit it(them) and then reimport in TB! It works fine but I was just
> wondering if there was a faster way to do this?
Move the message to the Outbox, edi
Hi,
I'm doing some "Spring Cleaning" in my mailboxes and was wondering if
there is a "simple" way to edit received messages.
The situation is the following: there are some pretty long messages in
my Inbox and for some of them I'm really interested in keeping only
p
20 matches
Mail list logo
