RW>> I'm planning on buying a Mac in the not too distant future too and there
RW>> are just two Windows programmes that I couldn't do without which are my
RW>> Diary programme and TB!. I plan on using Parallels to be able to run
RW>> them both.
> I'll probably end going that route as well.
Be c
Richard,
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 8:51:24 PM, you wrote:
RW> I'm planning on buying a Mac in the not too distant future too and there
RW> are just two Windows programmes that I couldn't do without which are my
RW> Diary programme and TB!. I plan on using Parallels to be able to run
RW> them bot
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 you wrote in
RHS> I'll report later how all of this goes. I do think I'm going to like
RHS> the Apple, since most of my non-e-mail and browsing time at home is
RHS> now spent with digital photos. Hope Ritlabs comes out with a Mac
RHS> version down the road so I
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 12:37:02 PM, you wrote:
W> The name of a file doesn't change the contents of the
W> file. In this case, an extension isn't necessary. On the
W> OSX side, the import process wants the files to be in a
W> single directory, and the files are read in a separate
W> file sele
Hello, Richard.
On 2/11/07, Richard H. Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris,
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:51:32 AM, you wrote:
CW> Try exporting to a Unix mailbox.
I'm starting the process of exporting folders, and it looks like I'll
have to do them one by one.
It does have to be don
Chris,
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:51:32 AM, you wrote:
CW> Try exporting to a Unix mailbox.
I'm starting the process of exporting folders, and it looks like I'll
have to do them one by one. However, I'm stumped on the format. When I
select export to unix, it doesn't select the file extension
Hello Elaine!
On Saturday, February 03, 2007, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
>> I guess this comment means that you already know
>> about running Windows on an Apple hard drive.
> Mary, most Macs are now intel ready, and the new
> OS due out in a few months will probably contain
> BootCamp which will make
>> I, on the other hand, have 20K messages and do like TB!, so will stick
>> with it even if I switch also.
ASK> Buying (expensive) Apple hardware to run Windows (requires an extra
ASK> license) on it just to use TB sounds a little bit contradictory to me.
I didn't se any comments about running
> Buying (expensive) Apple hardware to run
> Windows (requires an extra
> license) on it just to use TB sounds a little
> bit contradictory to me.
> :-)
Everyone I know is running Apple primarily and
using the Windows for those programs that
absolutely will not transfer but that they
absolutely w
Elaine,
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 9:13:51 AM, you wrote:
E> Using an export to Unix you can import the unix
E> mail into AppleMail if you decide to go that
E> route. I have decided to use AppleMail only as a
E> backup mail program and removed the mail I had
E> transferred there.
Thanks for th
> I guess this comment means that you already know
> about running Windows on an Apple hard drive.
Mary, most Macs are now intel ready, and the new
OS due out in a few months will probably contain
BootCamp which will make using Windows on a Mac
much easiier than it's been and it certainly
hasn't
> I will probably continue to run TB! using the
> dual capability of the new Apples. Still, life
> would be so much easier if there were a Mac
> version of TB!.
I do use a MacBook and run Parallels/Windows XP on
the intel ready laptop. While not my preference,
I don't intend to give up TheBat!
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, February 03, 2007, 7:26 AM, you wrote:
> ... (Note - not intending to set off a debate here on the merits of
> Windows v. Mac.) In the event I move to Apple as well down the road,
> I will probably continue to run TB! using the dual capability of the
> new Apples. Stil
My preference is obviously to stick to TB! as well, but other family
members want to "make the switch". If the import doesn't work, I can
obviously set them up to run in parallel, but would prefer to not have
to use Windows if I don't have to so they don't have to worry as much
about AV apps, firew
> I'll give that a try. I'm going to the Apple store shortly (on a
> "pre-buying" visit, and will ask them to check from their end.
TheBat! won't work with Apple and you are going to
be vastly disappointed in AppleMail. I continue
to use my PC so I can use TheBat!
--
Elaine
___
Chris,
I'll give that a try. I'm going to the Apple store shortly (on a
"pre-buying" visit, and will ask them to check from their end.
--
Rick
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:51:32 AM, you wrote:
CW> Richard H. Stoddard @ 2007-2-02 5:39:44 AM "Exporting to Apple
Richard H. Stoddard @ 2007-2-02 5:39:44 AM
"Exporting to Apple"
> is there a way to export mailboxes and the address books so they can
> be imported into Apple's mail program?
Try exporting to a Unix mailbox.
--
Chris
Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Buil
Greetings,
My and daughter wife have finally convinced me to buy them a new Apple
computer. I know we can run TB! on it using third-party software, but
is there a way to export mailboxes and the address books so they can
be imported into Apple's mail program? (Life would be so much easier
if TB! w
18 matches
Mail list logo
