Re: Fed up with BayesIt
Hello Code, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote: Can you guys suggest a better alternative? http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy... -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Fed up with BayesIt
Hello Code, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote: Can you guys suggest a better alternative? http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy... But are you checking more than six email accounts. I have had to give up because the only six at a time business means that various mailvoxes don't get checked when you've got more than six accoutns tocheck. I gather this is a Win thing partly and so I guess any proxying 127.0.0.1 system is going to have the same problem. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Fed up with BayesIt
Hi admin, Hello Code, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote: Can you guys suggest a better alternative? http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy... aacu But are you checking more than six email accounts. I have had to give aacu up because the only six at a time business means that various aacu mailvoxes don't get checked when you've got more than six accoutns aacu tocheck. aacu I gather this is a Win thing partly and so I guess any proxying aacu 127.0.0.1 system is going to have the same problem. I use K9, which is basically the same a POPFile (localhost proxy). I check 8 accounts, no problem. 99.99% on 11,000 e-mails in 6 months, low resource use too. (under 1800k mem and CPU use is negligible when checking mail... no IMAP though...). -- Mike Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 The Bat! 3.0.0.19 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Fed up with BayesIt
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way, I'm not prepared to invest any more time in it. Can you guys suggest a better alternative? -- Code 2 :canadaflag: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! version 2.12.00 on Windows XP Service Pack 2 In the offices of a New Jersey loan company: Ask about our plans for owning your home. Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Fed up with BayesIt
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way, I'm not prepared to invest any more time in it. Can you guys suggest a better alternative? Yes, use SpamAssassin. Not sure if it could be used though The bat! though. I am using it in conjunction with my email server to mark messages as SPAM. It works very effectively (would be better if The Bat!'s email filters would work good with IMAP folders). ~S ยด -- Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Fed up with BayesIt
Hello Code, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:51:47 PM, you wrote: C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt C2 just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way, C2 I'm not prepared to invest any more time in it. C2 Can you guys suggest a better alternative? I would suggest K9 or Popfile. They are 3rd-party programs, but mine is about 98% right ( I use K9). There is also the OTHER Bayes plugin, Bayes Filter, by Achim Winkler. -- Best regards, Paul Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Fed up with BayesIt
Hello Code2, On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt C2 just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way, C2 I'm not prepared to invest any more time in it. C2 Can you guys suggest a better alternative? There is another bayesian filter plug-in for TB! called Bayes Filter: http://www.lkcc.org/achim I've been using it for about a week now with good results. HTH -- Best wishes, Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
