Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hello Kevin Amazon, 09-Aug-2004 00:53, you wrote: Strangely enough, I see the reference headers in Gerard's message but not In-Reply-To header and his messages do not thread on my system either. Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using version 2.12.00 of TB, and those who report threadings works just fine are using, as far as the information is availabe, the 2.12.xx version ,too. You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-) -- Best regards, Alexander [Women Jurors] are like arsenic and old lace; they come in crying in their lace handkerchiefs, and then they put you in the gas chamber. (Melvin Belli) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using version 2.12.00 of TB, and those who report threadings works just fine are using, as far as the information is availabe, the 2.12.xx version ,too. You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-) I thought you were on to something but I'm now here at work, using v2.12.00, and Gerard's messages are still not threading. -- -=[ Allie ]=- :acm: List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.12.00 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgpqXpm9PrgUP.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hello Allie Martin, 09-Aug-2004 17:56, you wrote: You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-) I thought you were on to something but I'm now here at work, using v2.12.00, and Gerard's messages are still not threading. OIC. Just looked at the first message were you reported broken threading, and in that signature I saw 2.13... -- Best regards, Alexander Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Alexander S. Kunz wrote: OIC. Just looked at the first message were you reported broken threading, and in that signature I saw 2.13... Yes. I use v2.13 beta/3 at home and I use v2.12.00 at work. :) -- -=[ Allie ]=- :acm: List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.12.00 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgpWSQBDC0wgq.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
ON Sunday, August 8, 2004, 8:31:18 PM, you wrote: AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of AM the message that you're replying to. AM I wonder where that header is disappearing to? AM Are you using TB!? If so, then something is deleting that header. Hi Allie, The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to tread as far as I can see. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hi Zonnet - On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:34:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:34 AM where I live) you wrote: Hi Allie, The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to tread as far as I can see. Here is another message that doesn't have an In-Reply-To header that didn't thread on my end. -- Best Regards, Kevin PGP Keys: idap://keyserver.pgp.com idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370 Using The Bat! v2.12.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgplQ4KkfBLac.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hallo Alexander, On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:15:44 +0200GMT (9-8-2004, 17:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: ASK You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-) So am I and here they threaf. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/4 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Zonnet, [Z] wrote: You have proven it to be technically possible to do this but I do not see the value of multiple addresses in the From: field. I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of the message that you're replying to. I wonder where that header is disappearing to? Are you using TB!? If so, then something is deleting that header. -- Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user] The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1) . Fer sell cheep: IBM spel chekker. Wurks grate. pgpbN7U8h6RZM.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hallo Allie, On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:31:18 -0500GMT (8-8-2004, 20:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of AM the message that you're replying to. Gerard's messages do contain the references header, that should be enough for threading. (It is over here.) -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not threading (Was: Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)
Hi Roelof Otten - On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, at 23:49:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:49 PM where I live) you wrote: AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of AM the message that you're replying to. Gerard's messages do contain the references header, that should be enough for threading. (It is over here.) Strangely enough, I see the reference headers in Gerard's message but not In-Reply-To header and his messages do not thread on my system either. -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpzhfLgkn0ZN.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
