-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 17:36:24 -0400,
@ @ when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Mica posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
MM>> I made some Selective Download filters, using most frequently used
MM
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Paul posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
jrsn>> First thing is to filter out all msgs that are not
jrsn>> addressed to
jrsn>> you. That will take care of the majority of the msgs.
PC> this sounds backwards. Here is
On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:36 PM, you wrote:
jrsn> First thing is to filter out all msgs that are not addressed to
jrsn> you. That will take care of the majority of the msgs.
this sounds backwards. Here is my idea:
1. known filter for everyone in your AB
2. all lists to separate folders
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Mica posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
MM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MM> Hash: SHA1
MM>***^\ ."_)~~
MM> ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 08:21:37 -0400,
MM>@ @ when [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 08:21:37 -0400,
@ @ when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If there is interest in how to defeat spam w/o bayesit, it has
> been discussed quite frequently on this list &,
> in additio
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Martin posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
C2>>> Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
JR>> IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
JR>> rarely see a spam & I don't use bayesit.
MW&g
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
C> I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
C> random words, like:
C> "annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final"
C> I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam filters like
C> BayesIt.
Hello Code,
On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:44:25 -0700 GMT [20:44 CEST] you wrote:
C2> I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
C2> random words, like:
C2> "annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final"
C2> I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 12:49:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Code posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
> regards to New spammer technique? :
C2>> Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
> IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
>
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 2:49 PM, you wrote:
jrsn> IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
jrsn> rarely see a spam & I don't use bayesit.
and the filter you use??
--
Paul
Using The Bat! v2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 13 July 2004, 14:49 -0400 (19:49 local time) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[JR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C2>> Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
JR> IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
JR> rarely
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Code posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
C2> Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
rarely see a spam & I don't use bayesit.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT U
I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
random words, like:
"annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final"
I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam filters like
BayesIt. If Bayesian filters look for certain recurring words
identified as c
13 matches
Mail list logo
