Re[2]: Noticable Folder Slowdown.

2001-06-13 Thread Joseph McDonald
MRH>> the account as a whole with my largest folder accounting for just MRH>> over 20,000 of those. The whole account message base has a file size [...] MRH>> I could probably do some good by purging and compressing myself MRH>> (haven't done that in a while) but overall I'd say TB! was coping

Re: Noticable Folder Slowdown.

2001-06-13 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:34:10 +0100, Mark thoughtfully wrote the following: ... MRH> Too offer my perspective on your observation, I have tended to find MRH> the versions of TB! that have been released since the 1.4x series to MRH> be a lot quicker at

Re: Noticable Folder Slowdown.

2001-06-13 Thread Mark R Harding
Jamie, Regarding your message dated: 13 June 2001... JD> I think I may be getting close to the limits of either the bat or JD> my machine for messages in a folder. On a PIII 500 with 192MB of JD> ram a folder with 1 messages each of about 4K takes 45 seconds JD> to open. I've tried the usual

Noticable Folder Slowdown.

2001-06-13 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL, I think I may be getting close to the limits of either the bat or my machine for messages in a folder. On a PIII 500 with 192MB of ram a folder with 1 messages each of about 4K takes 45 seconds to open. I've tried the usual purge