Re: One account for home and work

2004-02-24 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Alexander,

on Saturday, February 21, 2004, 3:10:27 AM, Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:

 So I'm looking for solution, how to synchronize one account (message
 base) for that two PCs, to have equal message bases, so when replying at home,
 don't reply at work etc...
 Yes i know about IMAP, but if exists any POP3|SMTP solution?

Well, in theory you could use the Synchronise function. If you have
a USB stick (or something similar) you could save the synchronisation
function. If it works? No idea. I never tested it.

But this is why I was asking for an extended synchronisation function
where you can upload adress-books, calendars etc. to a ftp-account (or
better upload it by scp (ssh-copy, which means that the transfer is
encrypted)) where the other The Bat can synchronise the data (see
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]).

For mails this might be more difficult as there is a bigger data
volume than with address book or calendar. But there I could imagine
that all data since last synchronisation is saved to the ftp-account.
By doing that you always would have synchronous data.

If you have a very fast internet connection you also could put the
data files on a share which you can access by mounting that
directories. Then you even don't have to synchronise data. But of
course the working will be definitely slower than working with a
message base stored locally...

-- 
Best regards,
 Martin

Using The Bat 2.04.4 on Windows XP



Current version is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One account for home and work

2004-02-24 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Allie,


21.02.2004, U wrote:

 With IMAP that problem doesn't exist. I fire up ThunderBird at work
 and see all folders with messages read and unread just as they are
 with TB! at home.

Alie! Have U seen normal filtering of Incoming mail of IMAP account
?!! It seems doesn't work for me :(( It perfectly works with POP3 as
it's well known, it works for Outgoing mail of IMAP but DOESN't for
Incoming mail of IMAP account :



Regards,
AG



Current version is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One account for home and work

2004-02-21 Thread Dave Gorman
Hello Alexander,

Saturday, February 21, 2004, 3:10:27 AM, you wrote:

 So I'm looking for solution, how to synchronize one account (message
 base) for that two PCs, to have equal message bases, so when
 replying at home, don't reply at work etc...

Leave messages on server for X number of days works OK for the
receiving part, but the sending/replying is still a nuisance. All I
can think to do is BCC yourself on all sends, but of course that is
a far from perfect solution.

I tried this with POP for quite some time and was always frustrated.
IMAP has been a godsend.

-- 
Dave
Using The Bat! v2.04 RC/3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.04.04 | quot;Using TBUDLquot; information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One account for home and work

2004-02-21 Thread Allie Martin
Dave Gorman, [DG] wrote:

DG Leave messages on server for X number of days works OK for the
DG receiving part,

Not really. I tried that arrangement for a while for my home and
office mail management. It took only a short while for me to look
seriously at IMAP for a solution and I eventually went that route even
though I knew many were having issues with TB!'s IMAP.

The problem exists especially when you manage a large volume of the
same mail at both locations. It's not nice reading 200 messages at
home and reach the office to see 260 new messages. I now have to find
the 60 new messages among the 200 others I read at home. This problem
would be especially bad after a weekend of not being at the office.
Sometimes, over a thousand messages are unread and scattered across
many folders.

With IMAP that problem doesn't exist. I fire up ThunderBird at work
and see all folders with messages read and unread just as they are
with TB! at home.

DG but the sending/replying is still a nuisance. All I can think to
DG do is BCC yourself on all sends, but of course that is a far
DG from perfect solution.

Actually, that solution is a pretty good one. At least you're not
faced with the problem I outlined above. You'll just have a copy of
all sent messages.

DG I tried this with POP for quite some time and was always frustrated.
DG IMAP has been a godsend.

Indeed!!

-- 
 -= allie_M =- | List Moderator
   PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com

Using TB! v2.04.4 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.04.04 | quot;Using TBUDLquot; information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html