Hello Bob,
Sunday, November 6, 2005, 2:45:39 AM, you wrote:
BM> G'day Jack,
BM> Sunday, November 6, 2005, 5:49:37 AM, you wrote:
>> Hello Bob,
>> Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:
>> Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
>> the box. I then s
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 2:01:30 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Hello Jack S. LaRosa & everyone else,
ASK> on 05-Nov-2005 at 20:49 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote:
>> Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
>> the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message
Hello Bob,
Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:
BM> Yes that is definitely the problem - well I'm almost sure :-) . Check
BM> the box and insert a limit over which K9 isn't to check messages and
BM> you hopefully won't see it fouling up on the large messages any more.
Well, I set
On 04/11/05, Jack S. LaRosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upon receipt of your message I looked at the 'Don't filter messages
> larger than' box and it's not checked, so there should be no size
> restriction. I too am using v1.28.
That's your problem. Check it.
Roman
--
_
Hello Bob,
Thursday, November 3, 2005, 11:31:51 PM, you wrote:
BM> G'day Jack,
BM> Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:
BM>
>> I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
>> receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of
>> you had sim
Hello John,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, 5:09:14 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, at 11:45:25 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:45:25 Australian
> Eastern Time) you wrote:
>> The only idea I have is the virus scanner. Try to exclude K9's data
>> directory from on-access scanning, maybe tha
Alexander,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
mind. Some of them
Hello Thorvald,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TN> My filter looks like this:
TN> TB! Message Filter
TN> beginFilter
TN> UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D]
TN> Name: SPAM
TN> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
TN> MoveMe
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly
>> different conditions. And, neither works consistently. It seems strange
>> that some mail classified as spam would be moved to the correct f
>> K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except
for spam words like Nigeria, Togo and Centra
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
I've received a couple lately and
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
>> folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you
>> to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for
>> th
Hello Mark,
On Monday, November 29, 2004, 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ>> The filter is as follows:
PJ>> TB! Message Filter
PJ>> beginFilter
PJ>> UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
PJ>> Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
PJ>> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW> That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW> mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW> shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW> what then? Is
Raymund,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 1:11:23 AM, you wrote:
RTT> Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
RTT> store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
RTT> can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
RTT> the mail from
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW> That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW> mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW> shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW> what then? Is
Hi,
On 7/19/2004 2:50 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> yes, that's it!
PC> then give it a folder to send it to , like SPAM..
That was the problem. I didnt have it set to kludges, I was unclear as
to what that was. Now I got it. It should work now.
Now I will just sit here.I cant believe Im going
Hi,
On 7/19/2004 2:49 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> when you select a filter, you can specify fields to search on. These
PC> include receiptient, sender, subject, text and kludges. Kludges are the
PC> headers. When you read an email, if you hit CONTROL-SHIFT-K you will see
PC> the full headers ( klud
Hi,
On 7/19/2004 2:25 PM my time, Marck wrote:
MDP> It's TB speak for message headers.
ahhh. Ok, thanks.
--
Darrin
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi,
So under strings I place ( X-Text-Classification: spam) and under
location I select (kludges)? Is that correct?
--
Darrin
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi,
On 7/19/2004 1:45 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> in the kludges
what exactly does "kludges" mean?
--
Darrin
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Peter,
Monday, July 19, 2004, 11:02:54 AM, you wrote:
PM> It seems to keep
PM> learning pretty well.
I had a pretty good experience with it myself along time ago. Just
installed it again and am trying it out myself to see.
--
Best regards,
Darrinmailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
On Wednesday at 10:22 AM you wrote:
G> Yes, this sounds right.
G> Kludges is a term from the old Fido network if I remember correctly and
G> means all the headers or all the info before the msg if you are looking
G> at the buy using F9
Thanks for responding. It slowly starting to learn. I ac
23 matches
Mail list logo
