Re[2]: threading title

Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:44:12 PM, you wrote: > lee walters @ 2005-Jul-1 3:37:39 PM > "threading title" >> I always loved the threading in previous versions of The Bat, but >> now in the latest version it has the name of the sender as a title, >> and you have to click the

Re[2]: Threading

Hello Marck, > That one's "in the oven" ;-). Stefan says he's added the function and > really likes it. It will be in with the next beta series. Actually, Stefan says it will be available in 3.5 post-release :-) -- Best regards, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Threading

> Hello Steve, >> Hi Marck, >> >> I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I >> could not find where to "Open Customise". Your assistance here would >> be greatly appreciated. > Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has > already given you an a

Re[2]: Threading

> It was Miguel, but I can tell you anyway. Right click any old toolbar > and choose "Customise" there. Silly me. I wrote to Miguel and gave your name. Thanks for the help. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 ___

Re[2]: Threading

> 1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then > click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and > select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right window > 'Current items' the context menu that you get when you right click on > the me

Re[2]: Threading

Hello Richard, ST>> I've added two more options to space bar ST>> reading today: to move to the next unread message (requested before) ST>> and to mark message as read when taking off the current message. RW> Hooray! thanks a lot for that. No problem. I'm starting to think that I'm getting addic

Re[2]: Threading

> You can Customise that. I was used to using Return in VA and I have > always used it in TB and still do I bet you can not remember how to set the return key to move to next unread message! If you can please do share it as that would be fantastic. I tried to work it out but can not. > I als

Re[2]: Threading

> Would View/Display/Only unread messages do what you're looking for? Not really as it hides the threads completely! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' informatio

Re[2]: Threading

> F4 works, but I still think that the reply button should do the same. I agree! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: Threading

> It's a pity that development stopped, I don't see lack of HTML > handling as an issue though, it gets deleted automatically here. In my new business I deal with a lot of tour managers who send me html formatted emails as well as attachments. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.co

Re[2]: Threading

> > Ah. Okay. Slight caveat - and I keep meaning to get this in as a > BugTraq issue - If you only have one line marked, it quotes nothing. I > find that it only works once I grab a terminating newline to finish it > off. No - tried that one thanks - I suspect the template theory Marck -- Best

Re[2]: Threading

> %Quotes > %Cursor That was the one. %Quotes. Thank you very much indeed everyone. Next question. Is there are away to automatically open any threads with unread messages to save having to click one's way down the chain? -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 21

Re[2]: Threading

>> find that it only works once I grab a terminating newline > > H, not here (see above). ;-) This is hilarious. We are all using different programs! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version

Re[2]: Threading

> Have you defined/revised templates? What's your Reply template? Oh dear - I can see where this is leading. YOu can have what you want with TB as long as you (a) do not screw the defaults or (b) create the settings yourself. I am not knocking that, it will ultimately lead to a more powerful i

Re[2]: Threading

> Ah - too late! You're already editing the reply. You should do as > suggested (F4 or shift-reply) while looking at the original message. Not on my Pro version it doesn't. I am sitting on the message, highlighted the text to be quoted, pressed f4 (or shift reply) and all it does is open a new

Re[2]: Threading

> F4 works, but I still think that the reply button should do the same. I find neither f4 (gives me a spell checker) or shift-replybutton does it. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.

Re[2]: Threading

> > Hello Steve, my old friend! ;-) We still have an outstanding drink > date. Marck - I did not know you cared! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re[2]: Threading

> Normally it is a bad idea to keep too many messages in the In- and > Outboxes. Why do you say that Peter? -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http:

Re[2]: Threading

> I wonder if you remember > me. I certainly do Miguel. YOu were very active in the VA Yahoo Group (more or less ran it yourself). Which reminds me The Bat! folks - when we have highlighted some text in a READ message why not provide a button on the SEND message that pastes any highlighted te

Re[2]: Threading

> Keeping important messages in the Inbox is suicide. That's a > substantiated fact. Messages are being added to and deleted from the > folder continually. You think NT or 9x are stable enough to guarantee > no glitches when data is being moved that frequently? I don't! To be honest Marck, I hav

Re[2]: threading configuration

Hi Maurice, On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 8:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS> Most notably, my experience shows that people using the following will MS> always cause mails to look as if they were new threads: MS> * Hotmail (unless used with OE or some Hotmail popper) MS> * AOL MS> * Earlier

Re[2]: threading configuration

> Have you tried threading by reference instead of by subject? Yes, but it doesn't work. The replies of only one member of the list are detected as being in the same thread. But thanks for the idea ! My question is : I'm new to this list and i don't speak perfect english.. But i wondered i

Re[2]: Threading by reference

Hi Do you know anything about a port to Linux? I've been using Kylix and BCB under Linux, porting Windows apps took about a day per app on average. From what I understand TB is written in Delphi. Shouldn't be that hard to port and would win a big market for Ritlabs. Roberto Sunday, March 9, 2003

Re[2]: threading by subject

Hello Thomas, On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 at 00:46:54[GMT +0700](which was 18:46 where I live) you wrote: >> Yes, if there was a wish list that would come high on mine too. TF> There is one. Check out this link: TF> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html and click on "Bug TF> Reporting and Fe

Re[2]: threading by subject

On Friday, October 18, 2002, 5:44:05 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> TB very often goes to the very top of the mail folder instead of the >> last message I was on. TF> TB does that all the time after compressing the folders. The main TF> message list has the latest message at the bottom, I also ha

Re[2]: threading by subject

Hello Thomas, On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 23:44:05[GMT +0700](which was 17:44 where I live) you wrote: TF> TB does that all the time after compressing the folders. The main TF> message list has the latest message at the bottom, I also have to TF> scroll down often. I wish I could make TB go to the bot

Re[2]: threading (or really, unthreading) a folder??

Hello Melissa, Monday, February 04, 2002, 5:43:33 PM, you wrote: MR> On Monday, February 04, 2002, at 5:35:49 PM PST, Peter Bennett wrote: >> How the h*** do you enable and disable threading in a folder? MR> Hello Peter, MR> You can go to the "View" menu on the toolbar, go down to "View threa

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

Hello Januk, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 4:04:38 AM, you wrote: JA> I sent a bug report about this a while ago, let's hope it gets fixed. JA> But in the mean time, since you *do* want the reversed colours, just JA> shift your view. Have the filter *Move* the message to the other JA> filter, an

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

Hello Januk, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 4:10:41 AM, you wrote: GV>>> Thanks for the info :) I guess I'd better be content with GV>>> threading by subject... MP>> ... or persuading your friend to use a "friendlier" email program ;-) MP>> (I'm kidding- of course). JA> (so am I) JA> I dunno, the

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

Hello Marck, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 3:55:04 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Vandor, Vandor? Marck, I deliberately use the international order for my name here (first name first, while we in Hungary put family names first) so that templates can

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

Hello, JA> Does your correspondent's e-mail contain the headers: JA> In-reply-To: JA> References: Prolly not :) And I don't even want to know how I could check :) Text editor maybe? JA> These are the headers TB uses for threading by references. If they JA> are not there, TB can't thread this

Re[2]: Threading in 1.48

Hello Januk, On Monday, December 18, 2000 you wrote: > Try the different threading options available under: > View -> View threads by Thank you for your reply. I guess I was not quite clear - what I meant was: could someone please explain (what appeared to me as) *the defective* side of TB's t

Re[2]: Threading?

Hi A., Thursday, September 21, 2000, 4:32:05 PM, you wrote: > IGNORE all that tripe. Just highlight the message, and from the popup > menu go to specials and select 'Add sender to address book'. LOL! Okay. I think I'll be happy with just using the above mentioned. If I feel the need to automa

Re[2]: Threading?

Hi A., Thursday, September 21, 2000, 2:47:30 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > You may set the view differently for each folder, yes. You however, seem > to have 'use default column settings' enabled for each folder. You may > access this setting by right click

Re[2]: Threading not always correct?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, on Sat, 19 Aug 2000 19:54:45 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 19.08.2000, 20:54:45 (GMT+0200) my local time, you wrote about "Threading not always correct?": MDP> The explanation runs as follows: every message is assigned a uniqu

Re[2]: Threading question

Hello TBUDL, On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, , Thomas Fernandez wrote: MDP>> Pass. Many do. Some don't. I haven't researched it. > I receive a lot of message sent by Outlook. They don't seem to thread > by ref. Let's see: Those that support it: The Bat! :) Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.130

Re[2]: Threading question

> We do? Apart from a few unbelievers / nobodys ;) -- DL (snip sig to compensate for OTness) -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:

Re[2]: Threading question

Hi Marck, Monday, August 07, 2000, 12:28:38 PM, you wrote: K>> I assume that threading by subject threads those messages with the K>> same subject (although, if so, it does seem to leave some out)? > Only if the subject has been changed. Well, for example, I had a folder where there was messa

Re[2]: Threading

Wednesday, November 24, 1999 Hello Ali, Tuesday, Tuesday, November 23, 1999, you wrote: Ali>Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: AM>>> OK, I could rest it in my little webspace and provide a link in the AM>>> future. >> That would be more suitable a solution in view of the list rule of "no >> attac

Re[2]: Threading

On 23 November 1999 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: >> Wouldn't it be neat to include this in the .zip file when people >> download TB from the web site? Or post it on the web site otherwise >> for anyone interested to download? - Just an idea. AM> OK, I could rest it in my little

Re[2]: Threading

On 23 November 1999 at 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: >> The FAQ is unofficial, too, and on Leif's site. If you send the >> shortcut list to him, perhaps he'll add it to his page. AM> Has Leif mysteriously disappeared again? No, he's around. I had a private message from him this mo

Re[2]: Threading

Hallo Ali, On Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 7:16:40 PM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote: AM> AM>>> Here it is attached for you and all the other new subscribers who AM>>> haven't yet gotten a copy. >> Wouldn't it be neat to include this in the .zip file when people >> download TB from the web site?

Re[2]: Threading

Tuesday, November 23, 1999 Hello Ali, Tuesday, Tuesday, November 23, 1999, you wrote: Ali>Deryk Lister wrote: >> Keyboard shortcuts? Ooh, if you have this still I'd love a copy :) >> I have to say, TB could do with some documentation - it just seems >> more normal to read how the program

Re[2]: Threading

Hi Ali, on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 5:48:47 AM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: >> Keyboard shortcuts? Ooh, if you have this still I'd love a copy :) >> I have to say, TB could do with some documentation - it just seems >> more normal to read how the program works for yourself than having to >>

Re[2]: Threading

\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Deryk, DL> Any idea what will collapse all threads? It wasn't the obvious DL> "control /" :-) no, sorry... I'm looking for that key too :-)