Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

Thursday, April 12, 2001, 10:53:13 AM, you wrote: >> also same if you delete heaps of them at once, your machine may >> seem to "Hang" as the HDD re-writes hundreds or thousands of >> FAT-entries... ...just wait for it to finish gracefully! > As said, 0-byte files take up directory entries, but

Re: Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

"Jonathan Wayne on| | TBUDL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | cc: (bcc: Jonathan Wayne/PAMG/Prudential) | | Subject: Re[2]: Why so many undeleted b

Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

¿ Cutting of replys! ? -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe: You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

Hello Dierk, On Thursday, April 12, 2001 at 09:33:24GMT +0200 (which was 09:33 AM where I live) you wrote: >> I wouldn't call it a bug DH> I would, simply because I think every programme should, when you exit DH> it normally, delete its temp files. I agree, this is definitely a bug since

Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, at 09:41:45 [GMT -0700] Ming-Li wrote: >> I'm still with Beta 1 because with Beta 3 and 4, there were >> absolutely hundreds of temp files left behind... ML> FWIW, I use beta 4 and there's no temp files in my temp

Re[2]: Why so many undeleted bat-tmp files in the temp-directory?

Wednesday, April 11, 2001, 10:57:50 AM, you wrote: > On April 10, 2001, at 1:19:46 PM, Anton Sommer wrote: >> there are dozents of temp files in the temp-dir. They are still there >> when I close TB. >> Is that usual? > I'm still with Beta 1 because with Beta 3 and 4, there were absolutely > h