Re[2]: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-07-02 Thread subscriber2list
Hello Thomas, Friday, July 2, 2004, 3:09:44 PM, you wrote: s>> Would you, by any chance, be able to point me in the right direction s>> for a list of the currently defined key combinations used in TB!? TF> Click on the link at the bottom of each message and look for the FAQ TF> file, or go dir

Re: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello subscriber2list, On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:18:19 -0400 GMT (02/07/2004, 20:18 +0700 GMT), subscriber2list wrote: s> Would you, by any chance, be able to point me in the right direction s> for a list of the currently defined key combinations used in TB!? Click on the link at the bottom of each

Re[2]: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-07-02 Thread subscriber2list
Hello Thomas, Thursday, July 1, 2004, 12:35:52 PM, you wrote: s>> +Left or something similar. I started wondering what s>> they might have meant by "Left" ... TF> It's ambiguous. It can mean "left arrow" or "left mouse botton". So TF> people will usually be more specific. I agree wholehearte

Re: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello subscriber2list, On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:54:18 -0400 GMT (01/07/2004, 05:54 +0700 GMT), subscriber2list wrote: s> +Left or something similar. I started wondering what s> they might have meant by "Left" ... It's ambiguous. It can mean "left arrow" or "left mouse botton". So people will usua

Re: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-07-01 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello subscriber2list, On 30 June 2004, 18:54 -0400 (23:54 local time) subscriber2list [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... S> Well, I will continue to search for specifics and resubmit my question S> then. Sorry for any inconvenience ... hopefu

Re[2]: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-06-30 Thread subscriber2list
Hey Martin, Thank you so much for responding! Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:28:41 PM, you wrote: MW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MW> Hash: SHA1 MW> Hello subscriber2list, MW> On 30 June 2004, 14:33 -0400 (19:33 local time) subscriber2list [S] in MW> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S>> I jus

Re: Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-06-30 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello subscriber2list, On 30 June 2004, 14:33 -0400 (19:33 local time) subscriber2list [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S> I just want to confirm that I am interpreting commands that are S> listed in various emails correctly, as I do try them, but

Seeking confirmation of my interpretation of Key Nomenclature ...

2004-06-30 Thread subscriber2list
Howdy All I just want to confirm that I am interpreting commands that are listed in various emails correctly, as I do try them, but lots of times they don't work for me. LOL! For instance: ++L - I interpret this to mean hold down Shift+Ctrl keys and use L(eft arrow) ++R - I interpret this