SC>> I don't usually use it either. I was referring to the message that
SC>> keeps popping up when reading e-mail that says:
SC>> ,- [ Invalid HTML ! ]
TF> I haven't seen that since an early 2.x beta.
TF>>> I use a Pentium 4 with 1,7GHz, 512MB RAM, Chinese Windows 98. What
TF>>> else do you
Hello Stuart,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:18:13 -0500 GMT (06/09/2004, 00:18 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
TF>> I wouldn't know about the HTML editor. I used it once for testing
TF>> only.
SC> I don't usually use it either. I was referring to the message that
SC> keeps popping up when reading e-mail
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:54:47 AM, you wrote:
TF> Stuart Cuddy wrote:
TF>>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
TF>>> worse,
SC>> I am one of those that does not have this problem with Windows 98 and Version 3,
SC>> nor am I having problems wit
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:05:21 AM, Doug Weller
( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part:
Pank>> That is true here also and has been ongoing since 2.11beta6, or there
Pank>> about.
DW> No problems with XP Pro SP1 here.
And it seems that users using / above Win2K don't have this problem,
but
Hi Pank,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:14:01 PM, you wrote:
Pank> Sunday, September 5, 2004, 8:34:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez
Pank> ( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part:
TF>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
TF>> worse, [ .. ]
Pank> I can confirm that this s
Hello Stuart,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:45:17 -0500 GMT (05/09/2004, 21:45 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
TF>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
TF>> worse,
SC> I am one of those that does not have this problem with Windows 98 and Version 3,
SC> nor am I having p
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 7:34:05 AM, you wrote:
TF> Allister Jenks wrote:
AJ>> 1) The issues/bugs
TF> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
TF> worse, to the extent that I cannot upgrade until this particualr
TF> problem is solved. I have had this
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 8:34:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez
( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part:
TF> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
TF> worse, [ .. ]
I can confirm that this same problem is true here.
TF> Others report memory leaks, which again cannot be c
Hello Allister,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 18:03:44 +1200 GMT (05/09/2004, 13:03 +0700 GMT),
Allister Jenks wrote:
AJ> 1) The issues/bugs
I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become
worse, to the extent that I cannot upgrade until this particualr
problem is solved. I have had t
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 2:03:44 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
Allister> I know many TBUDLers are unhappy with the affair (and some aren't), but
Allister> has there been *any* response from RIT about all this?
If you want a 50-50 chance of:
a) no reply at all, or
b) a smartarse reply
Hello TBUDLers,
Having tired of reading the many-and-rambling threads on v3, would
somebody who has had the time please summarise:
1) The issues/bugs
2) Any info from RIT about licensing issues
I know many TBUDLers are unhappy with the affair (and some aren't), but
has there been *any* response
11 matches
Mail list logo
