ON Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 10:08:23 PM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Allie C Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Pietro Iacono on TBUDL
Subject: Re: failure notice
Isn't one of the basic rules to prevent being spammed is to never
Hello 3w
You wrote On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, at 23:47:11 [GMT +0200] (07:47 Wednesday where I live):-
I've been using GhostMail to do exactly this job, but it didn't
help. IMHO the only way to get rid of spam is to set up good
filter rules and just ignore it. My experience is: They just
won't
Hello Oleg,
I tried to reply you privately, but your administrator
prohibited relaying the e-mail.
Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 2:53:31 PM, you wrote:
OT Hello Peter,
OT I was unable to access that web site. Could you please check its
OT address as I am interested in BSM18.
OT Regards,
Ciao :-)
Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message that
server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist? I'd like to
set a rules that deletes spam mail directly from the server and
autoreplies to the spammer using that message. There are softwares,
Hello Pietro,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 18:58:29 +0200GMT (9-4-02, 18:58 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
PI Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message that
PI server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist? I'd like to
PI set a rules that deletes spam mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 18:58:37 +0200 [ Tue, 09 Apr 2002], Pietro Iacono [PI] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
PI Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message
PI that server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist? I'd
PI like
-Original Message-
From: Allie C Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Pietro Iacono on TBUDL
Subject: Re: failure notice
Isn't one of the basic rules to prevent being spammed is to never
reply to spam messages or respond to any of those
Hello Roelof
Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 6:57:04 PM, in which you wrote:
PI Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message that
PI server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist?
RO Sure. Just create a template for the auto-reply of your
Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 6:58:29 PM, you wrote:
Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message that
server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist? I'd like to
set a rules that deletes spam mail directly from the server and
autoreplies to the spammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 22:08:14 +0200 [ Tue, 09 Apr 2002], Brien King [BK] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
BK What he is trying to do is send a fake Bounce message.
Ah, I see.
Again futile in many instances. It's best to report them or just
filter them
Hello Brien,
Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 4:08:23 PM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Allie C Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Pietro Iacono on TBUDL
Subject: Re: failure notice
Isn't one of the basic rules to prevent being spammed
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 at 21:33:59 GMT -0700 (which was 9/2/2001
11:33 AM where you think I live) you told to the list :
SH [...] but I think better to set on Vacation Mode :-)
What is Vacation Mode? Is it like the old Nomail option?
If you not mentioned time limit set
Hello all,
on Sat, 1 Sep 2001, at 21:33:59 local time (GMT -0700), Januk wrote:
JA What is Vacation Mode? Is it like the old Nomail option?
yep, exactly the same ...
i just used 'unset TBBETA vacation' (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) to
activate the mailing list again, which i de-activated 2 weeks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck
On 01 September 2001 at 13:52:21 +0100 (which was 13:52 where I live) Marck
D Pearlstone wrote
MDP Guess who forgot to turn off the MultiPOP collector for the very same
MDP free-online account!!!
ROTFLMAO !!
If I see it again I will give
Hello Syafril,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:11:23 +0700 GMT (02/09/2001, 00:11 +0800 GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah created and sent a message, of which I just
received a duplicate.
I have just killed 13 dupes, and I don't think this was a server
problem. The message to which I am replying arrived for the
Hello Thomas F,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 at 00:33:54 GMT +0800 (which was 9/3/2001 11:33 PM
where you think I live) you told to the list :
I have just killed 13 dupes, and I don't think this was a server
problem. The message to which I am replying arrived for the second
time about 23 hrs 33 mins
Hello Thomas F,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 at 00:33:54 GMT +0800 (which was 9/3/2001
11:33 PM where you think I live) you told to the list :
I have just killed 13 dupes, and I don't think this was a server
problem.
Oops forgot response about this.
If you receive any duplicate, please send the
after all ...
all i got after replying was an e-mail with the subject 'failure notice' !
looks like it comes from Marck Pearlstone ??
can somebody explain what happened ??
Hi. This is the qmail-send program
Hello Rob,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 12:41:58 +0200 GMT (01/09/2001, 18:41 +0800 GMT),
Rob wrote:
R ah, so my reply made it to the list after all ...
R all i got after replying was an e-mail with the subject 'failure notice' !
R looks like it comes from Marck Pearlstone ??
R can somebody explain what
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 07:17:51PM +0800, Thomas F wrote:
The server on Marck's side (or his ISP, rather) has a problem. Each
message sent to his address is rejected. Furthermore, instead of
bouncing to the list admin (as would be correct), that server bounces
to the original sender. So, if
it to the list after all ...
R all i got after replying was an e-mail with the subject 'failure notice' !
R looks like it comes from Marck Pearlstone ??
R can somebody explain what happened ??
R
R Hi. This is the qmail-send
Hello flash,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:00:36 +0700 GMT (01/09/2001, 20:00 +0800 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no way of contacting Marck on another email address or by
phone. Syafril and Allie have received bounces themselves,
fwn No. They're not. But, they're already receive your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi flash,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:00:36 +0700, you wrote these words of wisdom:
...
fwn For some reasons, Marck's server (MDaemon) do some header
fwn rewriting, (i.e rewrite return-path header) which cause this
fwn problem.
Yes, he configured MDaemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:17:51 +0800, you wrote these words of wisdom:
...
R [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
R This message is looping: it already has my Delivered-To line. (#5.4.6)
TF Clearly the problem is at free-online's server.
Indeed, I got the
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 08:46:13PM +0800, Thomas F wrote:
They posted on TBUDL before, so they will have received the same
bounce every poster (including yourself just now) receives. ;-)
No, I'm not. Seems that Marck already know the problem.
Ah, I have no idea about MDaemon. So you probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi flash,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:03:31 +0700, you graced us with these comments:
...
They posted on TBUDL before, so they will have received the same
bounce every poster (including yourself just now) receives. ;-)
fwn No, I'm not. Seems
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 at 19:00:36 GMT +0700 (which was 9/1/2001
7:00 PM where you think I live) you told to the list :
I don't think so. Free-online use qmail. qmail put delivered-to
header only once, then if it get the same message (which has same
delivered-to
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:49:55PM +0700, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
Nope, while autoforward Mdaemon will keep return-path header intact.
Next Monday, I can ask Marck to check his Mdaemon logs.
Well, not to mention the fact that return-path header has already
changed by MDaemon. As I could
At 12:44 AM 9/2/2001 +0700, you wrote:
Nope, while autoforward Mdaemon will keep return-path header intact.
Next Monday, I can ask Marck to check his Mdaemon logs.
Well, not to mention the fact that return-path header has already
changed by MDaemon. As I could remember, we have met this kind
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:56:16AM +, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
At that time we have no Mdaemon logs, nor Qmail logs, and netzero involved.
This case we will have Mdaemon logs, hope this will clarify more better.
Indeed. But, hei .. I was never mention about namezero :-)
That one didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi flash,
On 01 September 2001 at 19:00:36 +0700 (which was 13:00 where I live)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
fwn it would love to think that it is a loop problem.
It was a *real* loop problem :-( - see
Hello Marck,
1. september 2001, 14:52:21, you wrote:
fwn For some reasons, Marck's server (MDaemon) do some header rewriting,
fwn (i.e rewrite return-path header) which cause this problem.
MDP Correct. The fault was all mine ... now corrected. Apologies to all
MDP those affected - all should
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 13:52:21 +0100 GMT (01/09/2001, 20:52 +0800 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Guess who forgot to turn off the MultiPOP collector for the very same
MDP free-online account!!!
LOLOLOLOL! :-D
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 at 13:52:21 GMT +0100 (which was 9/2/2001
7:52 PM where you think I live) you told to the list :
fwn For some reasons, Marck's server (MDaemon) do some header rewriting,
fwn (i.e rewrite return-path header) which cause this problem.
Correct. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On 01 September 2001 at 07:47:37 -0500 (which was 13:47 where I live)
Allie C Martin wrote to TBUDL and made these points:
ACM Yes, he configured MDaemon to deliver list mail to his free
ACM e-mail address while he's away and this may be
Hi Syafril,
Historians believe that Saturday, September 1, 2001 at 23:49 GMT +0700
was when, Syafril Hermansyah [SH] typed the following:
SH [...] but I think better to set on Vacation Mode :-)
What is Vacation Mode? Is it like the old Nomail option?
--
Thanks for writing,
Januk Aggarwal
36 matches
Mail list logo
