Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Vishal, On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:04:55 -0400GMT (12-9-03, 3:04 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO The ZoneAlarm thread you were mentioning had lots of separate branches RO that kept going on. V Since they all started with the same thread, shouldn't they have had a common V root though?

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Vishal, On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:06:54 -0400GMT (12-9-03, 3:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: V I use much the same system as you, and having the original root deleted V never messed things up before. Yes it did. But most threads don't separate into that many subthreads, so most of the

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Friday, September 12, 2003, 9:09:58 AM, you wrote: RO Well they had a common root, but when that common root is purged or RO manually deleted, the separate branches appear as different threads. I'm not clear on how exactly the different branches are formed when they all had a common

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Friday, September 12, 2003, 9:13:28 AM, you wrote: RO Yes it did. But most threads don't separate into that many subthreads, RO so most of the time you don't notice. Yes that seems likely. But it would only make sense if the threading works as I asked you in my previous mail.

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Vishal, On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 04:41:27 -0400GMT (13-9-03, 10:41 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO Well they had a common root, but when that common root is purged or RO manually deleted, the separate branches appear as different threads. V I'm not clear on how exactly the different

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Saturday, September 13, 2003, 7:25:20 AM, you wrote: RO Well I'll show with a diagram: Thanks for all the trouble, Roelof :) It's clear now. I was under the impression that everything treated the original message, not the one it replied to, as its root. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 5:56:44 AM, you wrote: RO The ZoneAlarm thread you were mentioning had lots of separate branches RO that kept going on. Since they all started with the same thread, shouldn't they have had a common root though? Or does all the Re[2]: business spoil

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Julian Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 6:44:58 AM, you wrote: JBL I checked the references on the broken threads that I have, and found JBL that I no longer had the messages with the MID: in my message base, JBL because they had purged. As I use a maximum limit of 200 messages for JBL

Re[3]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hello Vishal, V That doesn't seem right. I've often deleted the root message only to see many V properly threaded replies the next day. It's only since I installed v2 that this V is happening. Whell I never had it before eather. On some mailing list I only keep messages for 1 day. I upgraded

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Wilfried, On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:10:31 +0200GMT (10-9-03, 9:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: WM Whell I never had it before eather. On some mailing list I only WM keep messages for 1 day. I upgraded to v2 few days ago and just WM now I see that. Could be coincidence ? I suppose it's a

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 10:56:44 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: I suppose it's a coincidence. Threads are being shown as full threads as long as there aren't any branches split from their common root. The ZoneAlarm thread you were mentioning had lots of separate branches that kept going

some threads not sorted as threads

Hello, Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every time and the Re[x] is always incremented. I saw same fenomene in other mailing lists also with persons using The bat. --

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Wilfried, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:16:54 +0200GMT (9-9-03, 16:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: WM Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks WM - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every WM time and the Re[x] is

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:39:58 AM, you wrote: WM Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks WM - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every WM time and the Re[x] is always incremented. RO I'm viewing

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Vishal, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:55:43 -0400GMT (9-9-03, 17:55 +0200, where I live), you wrote: V I'm having the same problem. I don't purge the messages, but I do delete them V quickly. That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning of a thread, the rest won't

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hello Roelof, RO Only reason I can imagine it isn't threaded at your place is that you're RO purging your messages too soon. Yes thanks for clarify. That is the reason. It is a lot of reply on messages all deleted here. It's the first time I saw this and was wondering wy without running my

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:40:34 PM, you wrote: RO That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning RO of a thread, the rest won't thread properly. They will appear as RO separate thread, because the root they ought to have in common is RO gone. That doesn't