Hello Greg,
> Hopefully newer documentation on v2 will provide insight to users such as
> yourself. Hope the knee feels better, & take care! :-)
Yeah, I'll wait for the documentation :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
___
Hello MAU,
> Thanks Greg, but I don't use IMAP at all. In any case, the possible
> ticker issues wouldn't worry me because I don't use the ticker at all.
Unless I'm missing something here macros would be the only significant
issue with your upgrade to v2. I'm no macro expert, but from what I've
r
Hello Greg,
>> You are probably right in regards to TB, that is probably why I am
>> still on 1.62i and didn't even jump to 1.62r. My "stability meter"
>> (quite subjective, BTW) hasn't advised this jump yet :)
>
> Oh just jump!
Well, not today. MY right knee is hurting to much ;-)
> I don't re
Hello MAU,
>> Is there such a thing with TB!? The reason I wonder is because I have
>> trouble recalling anytime when only bug fixing occurs between
>> versions. Usually new features are being added. So there's never
>> really a time when you can say that a particular version contains
>> features
Hello Allie,
> Is there such a thing with TB!? The reason I wonder is because I have
> trouble recalling anytime when only bug fixing occurs between versions.
> Usually new features are being added. So there's never really a time
> when you can say that a particular version contains features that
Mau, [M] wrote:
M> Agree, but it has always been my policy (for any software I use for
M> work) to NOT upgrade as soon as a new version is released. I usually
M> wait until it is a bit more "polished" and stable :)
Is there such a thing with TB!? The reason I wonder is because I have
trouble reca
11-Sep-2003 01:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> some other macros have slightly different meaning or syntax in 2.00
Is there a list which are affected, and how?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Lottery: A tax on people who don't understand statistics.
Hello Roelof,
RO> I switched several times between the 2.00 betas and 1.62r and that
RO> caused me no problems. The only difference is that 2.00 uses a
Thanks all for the help. I can confirm the old *.exe runs just fine, and new
maded folders are not seen just like that, but that was not impo
Hello Roelof,
> And then there are back-ups to make that easy.
Agree, but it has always been my policy (for any software I use for
work) to NOT upgrade as soon as a new version is released. I usually
wait until it is a bit more "polished" and stable :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Esco
Hallo MAU,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:19:59 +0200GMT (11-9-03, 9:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M> but I would really hate to have to come back to 1.62 and have to
M> undo the tweaking.
And then there are back-ups to make that easy.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
__
Hello Roelof,
> I should elaborate on that. 2.00 has some extra macros. Those have no
> function in 1.62 And some other macros have slightly different
> meaning or syntax in 2.00, that's worse.
Thanks. That is what I thought and that is why I haven't even tried v2.0
yet. I do a lot of automatic
Hello Wilfried,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:59:28 +0200 GMT (11/09/2003, 01:59 +0700 GMT),
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
> I can make copy of course of folders. What about registry ? Can there be
> messed up something ?
I don't know, but a backup should be in order.
Back up the whole key HKCU / Softw
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 6:59:05 PM, Wilfried wrote:
WM> Is v2 compatible with older version v1.62 ?
WM> I think I saw messages about changes, so I'm not sure.
Wilfrid,
If you have only POP accounts (no IMAP) then you can simply
reinstall v1.x over the top of v2 and the f
Hallo Roelof,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:07:28 +0200GMT (11-9-03, 1:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M>> What about macros and templates, are they fully compatible?
RO> Nope.
I should elaborate on that. 2.00 has some extra macros. Those have no
function in 1.62 And some other macros have slightl
Hallo MAU,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:19:35 +0200GMT (10-9-03, 23:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> As I mentioned, everything works alright. I changed several times
>> without ill effects.
M> What about macros and templates, are they fully compatible?
Nope.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
___
Hello Roelof,
> As I mentioned, everything works alright. I changed several times
> without ill effects.
What about macros and templates, are they fully compatible?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Hallo Wilfried,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:59:05 +0200GMT (10-9-03, 19:59 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
WM> Is v2 compatible with older version v1.62 ?
WM> I think I saw messages about changes, so I'm not sure.
I switched several times between the 2.00 betas and 1.62r and that
c
Hello MAU,
M> That is exactly the reason I am still on 1.62i and will not upgrade for
M> some time :)
I was so stupid g
--
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
Current
Hello Wilfried,
> I need it for my work, so I cannot effort giving myself hours of
> problems :)
That is exactly the reason I am still on 1.62i and will not upgrade for
some time :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
_
Hello Thomas,
TF> No guarantees.
Hmm the phrase I dont wanted to hear :)
I can make copy of course of folders. What about registry ? Can there be
messed up something ? I need it for my work, so I cannot effort giving myself
hours of problems :)
--
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.bi
Hello Wilfried,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:59:05 +0200 GMT (11/09/2003, 00:59 +0700 GMT),
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
> Is v2 compatible with older version v1.62 ?
If you didn't change anything in the folder structure, there is no
issue. If you did, hit ctrl-alt-shft-L after you downgr
Hello,
Is v2 compatible with older version v1.62 ?
I think I saw messages about changes, so I'm not sure.
The main reason I ask, is that I have AV problems with v2, and I maybe can try
the old EXE (I renamed it to keep it). But if there are compatibility issues
then maybe I just b
22 matches
Mail list logo
