On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Martin posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
C2 Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
JR IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
JR rarely see a spam I don't use bayesit.
MW That was really helpful...
Being less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 08:21:37 -0400,
@ @ when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is interest in how to defeat spam w/o bayesit, it has
been discussed quite frequently on this list see archives ,
in
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Mica posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
MM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MM Hash: SHA1
MM***^\ ._)~~
MM ~( __ _o Was Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 08:21:37 -0400,
MM@ @ when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is interest
On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:36 PM, you wrote:
jrsn First thing is to filter out all msgs that are not addressed to
jrsn you. That will take care of the majority of the msgs.
this sounds backwards. Here is my idea:
1. known filter for everyone in your AB
2. all lists to separate folders
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Paul posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
jrsn First thing is to filter out all msgs that are not
jrsn addressed to
jrsn you. That will take care of the majority of the msgs.
PC this sounds backwards. Here is my idea:
PC 1. known filter
I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
random words, like:
annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final
I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam filters like
BayesIt. If Bayesian filters look for certain recurring words
identified as
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Code posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
C2 Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
rarely see a spam I don't use bayesit.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V2.12 RC/4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 13 July 2004, 14:49 -0400 (19:49 local time) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[JR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C2 Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
JR IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
JR rarely
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 2:49 PM, you wrote:
jrsn IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
jrsn rarely see a spam I don't use bayesit.
and the filter you use??
--
Paul
Using The Bat! v2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast!
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 12:49:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Code posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to New spammer technique? :
C2 Any training suggestions for BayesIt?
IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
rarely see a spam I don't
Hello Code,
On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:44:25 -0700 GMT [20:44 CEST] you wrote:
C2 I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
C2 random words, like:
C2 annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final
C2 I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
C I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
C random words, like:
C annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final
C I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam filters like
C BayesIt.
12 matches
Mail list logo
