Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-19 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 7:30:25 PM, in
mid:1679766999.2009063...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote:



 The recommended way to handle this case is to put all
 of the recipients in the BCC: header field, which will
 be removed when the message is actually sent, and to
 put undisclosed recipients:; in the TO: field. (Note
 the trailing :; which satisfies the requirement for
 something in the TO: field by using the under-utilized
 group syntax.)

If I put undisclosed recipients:; (or any other text ending ;:) in
the TO: field I find that TB! does not send the To: header.

If I put an addressee in the To: field as well as undisclosed
recipients:; the To: header is sent containing the recipient and not
the undisclosed recipients:; string.

Anybody confirm this?

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Editing is a rewording activity

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-19 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 20:30:25, Bill McQuillan wrote:

 The recommended way to handle this case is to put all of the recipients in
 the BCC: header field, which will be removed when the message is actually
 sent, and to put undisclosed recipients:; in the TO: field. 

Actually, don't put anything in the To field - Undisclosed Recipients
is added by Postfix when there's no To field automatically (what other
MTAs do varies though).

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

Cannot open file d:\program files\the bat!\murphy.txt



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Chew Yoke Lim
Hello Paul

On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:51:00 PM, you wrote:

 Hello tb...@thebat.,

 Thursday, June 11, 2009, 3:31:11 PM, you wrote:

CYL Hello

CYL Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail
CYL to  a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each
CYL of the e-mail received?

CYL I had for many years used Pegasus Mail, and it has what is known as
CYL distribution  lists,  in  which  one can enter e-mail addresses either
CYL directly or selected from the address book, but the e-mail sent out
CYL does not have the e-mail addresses of the recipients; it will show an
CYL e-mail address invented by the sender when creating the distribution
CYL list,  in  an  e-mail address format, e.g., recipi...@group.org, which
CYL address,  I  believe,  is  linked  to  the  addresses entered into the
CYL distribution list. 

CYL I have checked the help files of The Bat! but could not find anything
CYL pertaining to this.  Have I overlooked anything?

 Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to
 people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC:
 blind copy instead of in To:

If  I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members
of a society of which I am a member, very often, is there a way of NOT
having  to insert their addresses each time I send them an e-mail, but
pick  up  all  the addresses from a distribution list I only have to
create once?

I   have   not  used BCCs in The Bat!, so I don't know if by doing so,
the  recipients'  addresses  are  suppressed.   But  some other e-mail
clients, the BCCs still show up in the e-mail in the header line BCC.

-- 
Best regards,
 Chew Yoke Limmailto:ylche...@gmail.com



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MONSELL
Hello Lim,

 Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to
 people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC:
 blind copy instead of in To:

If  I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members
of a society of which I am a member, very often, is there a way of NOT
having  to insert their addresses each time I send them an e-mail, but
pick  up  all  the addresses from a distribution list I only have to
create once?

I   have   not  used BCCs in The Bat!, so I don't know if by doing so,
the  recipients'  addresses  are  suppressed.   But  some other e-mail
clients, the BCCs still show up in the e-mail in the header line BCC.

I guess Mass Mailing would be ideal. Each address will receive a
personalized individual message as if you had sent it only to that
particular address. If you have 50 addresses, there will be 50
messages generated in the OUT box and each and every message will
contain only one recipient address OR you can also have a GROUP, but
all 50 email addresses will appear in the TO column and may be time
consuming to transmit if too much addresses are inserted.

-- 
best regards
rizvi



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chew,

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:31:11 +0800GMT (11-6-2009, 7:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

CYL Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail
CYL to  a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each
CYL of the e-mail received?

Basically TB offers two methods to achieve this.
You can either use the mass mailing feature or BCC your recipients.
The  mass  mailing  feature offers the possibility to personalise each
message and sends just as many messages as you've got recipients.
By  putting your recipients in the BCC header, you send one message to
multiple  recipients who don't see any recipient listed in the BCC. It
isn't  necessary  to place a recipient in the To field, though placing
your   own   address  there  means  that  message  is  less  prone  to
interception by spam filters.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. - Robert A.Heinlein
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.4
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpTbOVaQS10f.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chew,

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:47:28 +0800GMT (11-6-2009, 8:47 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

CYL I   have   not  used BCCs in The Bat!, so I don't know if by doing so,
CYL the  recipients'  addresses  are  suppressed.   But  some other e-mail
CYL clients, the BCCs still show up in the e-mail in the header line BCC.

They're not supposed to show up in the message the addressee receives,
but  they  do  show up in the sender's copy. I don't know what clients
you've  used  in  the past, but I've never run into a mail client that
didn't hide the BCC for the recipient.
You  can  test  this  for yourself by BCCing a message to yourself and
com[are the copy in Sent Mail to the one in your Inbox.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Everyone IS entitled to my opinion.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.4
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpEPzEXq1WNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 7:47:28 AM, Chew Yoke Lim wrote:

 If  I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members
 of a society of which I am a member, very often, is there a way of NOT
 having  to insert their addresses each time I send them an e-mail, but
 pick  up  all  the addresses from a distribution list I only have to
 create once?

I  think that you are looking at the Group feature in the addressbook.
You  will  see  in  the addressbook dialog for individuals there is an
entry  for  Group,  so you could define a group of society members and
then  use the mass mailing features to send messages to all members in
that Group.

There  is  more  information  in the help files which is worth reading
carefully as there are some choices about how groups interact with the
main addressbook.

Julian

-- 
   Julian Beach
   jul...@trink.co.uk
  jbli...@dial.pipex.com (List Traffic)



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 8:24:19 AM, in
mid:1343150610.20090611092...@otten.tv, Roelof Otten wrote:



 It isn't necessary to place a recipient in the To field, though
 placing your own address there means that message is less prone to
 interception by spam filters.


Here, TB! will not let me leave the TO field blank. A dialog box
appears when I hit send saying You cannot leave To: field blank
Maybe I have configured this in an option somewhere. (The terrible
email client we use at work has allowed me to accidentally do this, on
occasion - maybe it should be called Look Out?)

When I mail to a group from TB!, everybody goes in BCC and a
disposable address goes in To, not my address. This is because I do
not trust that recipients who may forward the message will have the
courtesy to remove my address from the To field of the forwarded
message.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

During an eruption - move away from the volcano - not towards it

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo MFPA,

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:17:57 +0100GMT (11-6-2009, 13:17 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:

M Here, TB! will not let me leave the TO field blank. A dialog box
M appears when I hit send saying You cannot leave To: field blank
M Maybe I have configured this in an option somewhere. (The terrible
M email client we use at work has allowed me to accidentally do this, on
M occasion - maybe it should be called Look Out?)

I'm  not  aware  of an option in TB that warns for an empty To header,
but  there  are  servers  that  don't  accept  those, is it TB passing
through a server response?

M When I mail to a group from TB!, everybody goes in BCC and a
M disposable address goes in To, not my address. This is because I do
M not trust that recipients who may forward the message will have the
M courtesy to remove my address from the To field of the forwarded
M message.

Forwarding  doesn't  mean  that  you're  using  the  same To header as
before.  However  the  original  To  header generally is listed in the
message  body,  but  so is the original From header. And  somehow  you
trust  them  to  remove  your address from the quoted From header? ;-)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

sorry, I don't date outside my species
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.4
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpVYAmuFSnNo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 12:45:44 PM, in
mid:1071914001.20090611134...@otten.tv, Roelof Otten wrote:



 I'm  not  aware  of an option in TB that warns for an
 empty To header, but  there  are  servers  that  don't
 accept  those, is it TB passing through a server
 response?

I made a mistake earlier - this dialog box only appears if To CC and
BCC are all empty.

I can't find an option, either. It is definitely from TB! The dialog
box appears when you would normally get the connection centre. The
title bar of the box is edit mail message - the same as a message
editor window before you fill the To field. When you press OK, the
dialog box disappears and the message editor window stays. You can
save as draft but not send or put in outbox or send now.

[...]

 the original To header generally is listed in the message body,

That is what I meant, even though not what I said!


 but so is the original From header. And somehow you trust them to
 remove your address from the quoted From header? ;-)

I guess I think more when doing it than when writing about it. My From
address for my occasional group mailings is one I use specifically for
the purpose that is set up to delete all incoming mail that does not
come from a member of the group. So I don't think of it as My
address.


-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

If you can't convince them, confuse them.

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Bill McQuillan

On Thu, 2009-06-11, MFPA wrote:
 On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 12:45:44 PM, in
 mid:1071914001.20090611134...@otten.tv, Roelof Otten wrote:

 I'm  not  aware  of an option in TB that warns for an
 empty To header, but  there  are  servers  that  don't
 accept  those, is it TB passing through a server
 response?

 I made a mistake earlier - this dialog box only appears if To CC and
 BCC are all empty.

The recommended way to handle this case is to put all of the recipients in
the BCC: header field, which will be removed when the message is actually
sent, and to put undisclosed recipients:; in the TO: field. (Note the
trailing :; which satisfies the requirement for something in the TO:
field by using the under-utilized group syntax.)

-- 
Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com
Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 7:30:25 PM, in
mid:1679766999.2009063...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote:


 The recommended way to handle this case is to put all
 of the recipients in the BCC: header field, which will
 be removed when the message is actually sent, and to
 put undisclosed recipients:; in the TO: field. (Note
 the trailing :; which satisfies the requirement for
 something in the TO: field by using the under-utilized
 group syntax.)

 I have seen undisclosed recipients:; so rarely that I didn't know
 it was a recommended construction. I have even seen one of the
 webmail services treat it as spam. 



-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

The One with The Answer is seldom asked The Question

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-10 Thread Paul Berger
Hello tb...@thebat.,

Thursday, June 11, 2009, 3:31:11 PM, you wrote:

CYL Hello

CYL Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail
CYL to  a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each
CYL of the e-mail received?

CYL I had for many years used Pegasus Mail, and it has what is known as
CYL distribution  lists,  in  which  one can enter e-mail addresses either
CYL directly or selected from the address book, but the e-mail sent out
CYL does not have the e-mail addresses of the recipients; it will show an
CYL e-mail address invented by the sender when creating the distribution
CYL list,  in  an  e-mail address format, e.g., recipi...@group.org, which
CYL address,  I  believe,  is  linked  to  the  addresses entered into the
CYL distribution list. 

CYL I have checked the help files of The Bat! but could not find anything
CYL pertaining to this.  Have I overlooked anything?



Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to
people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC:
blind copy instead of in To:


-- 



Paul

-
 Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2  

...Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! 



Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html