Re: TB! Save bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 04 February 2001 at 13:07:43 -0500 (which was 18:07 where I live) Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points: MK ... TheBat! seems to have a bug when you are trying to save a MK message to a text file and continues to detect the file exists MK even after changing the designated save file name. MK Is this problem fixed in a later build of TheBat!? I haven't come across this nor have I seen a report of it before. It's probably worth sending an official bug report to RIT labs (Help.. Feedback.. Bug report). This doesn't sound too complex or fundamental a bug and such bugs often get fixed fairly quickly. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOn2fFjnkJKuSnc2gEQJ03ACgyHhKoZKSYMmL8gi3BaIA9IwQgEAAoKtK rR8Nar7ZIxCXxdTiCoz0wO9F =GHJw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB! Save bug
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP On 04 February 2001 at 13:07:43 -0500 (which was 18:07 where I live) MDP Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points: MK ... TheBat! seems to have a bug when you are trying to save a MK message to a text file and continues to detect the file exists MK even after changing the designated save file name. MK Is this problem fixed in a later build of TheBat!? MDP I haven't come across this nor have I seen a report of it before. It's MDP probably worth sending an official bug report to RIT labs (Help.. MDP Feedback.. Bug report). This doesn't sound too complex or fundamental MDP a bug and such bugs often get fixed fairly quickly. When I sent this message to the list, I CC'd the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to report this error. I am not sure how responsive RIT Labs are when responding to bug reports. Anyone have any experiences on the response times and accuracy of answers from RIT Labs? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB! Save bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 04 February 2001 at 14:04:59 -0500 (which was 19:04 where I live) Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points: MDP Feedback.. Bug report). This doesn't sound too complex or MDP fundamental a bug and such bugs often get fixed fairly quickly. MK When I sent this message to the list, I CC'd the message to MK [EMAIL PROTECTED] to report this error. Excellent. MK I am not sure how responsive RIT Labs are when responding to bug MK reports. Anyone have any experiences on the response times and MK accuracy of answers from RIT Labs? It varies from bug to bug AFAICS. Some reported bugs are still outstanding. Others are fixed the same day. I think that a lot depends on whether or not the problem can be easily reproduced and if fixing it is not going to have a major disruptive impact on any of the general workings (if you know what I mean). Of course, this is just conjecture from the way it seems to go rather than definitive knowledge. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOn2utznkJKuSnc2gEQLkSACbBdGANmJszg+P6MntU9UjUL6UFh8AnROp m2sLvX3M7ROz+is1+Pgzw2iJ =EWOA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
