-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 04 February 2001 at 14:04:59 -0500 (which was 19:04 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
MDP>> Feedback.. Bug report). This doesn't sound too complex or
MDP>> fundamental a bug and such bugs often get fixed fairly quickly.
MK> When I sent this message to the list, I CC'd the message to
MK> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to report this error.
Excellent.
MK> I am not sure how responsive RIT Labs are when responding to bug
MK> reports. Anyone have any experiences on the response times and
MK> accuracy of answers from RIT Labs?
It varies from bug to bug AFAICS. Some reported bugs are still
outstanding. Others are fixed the same day.
I think that a lot depends on whether or not the problem can be easily
reproduced and if fixing it is not going to have a major disruptive
impact on any of the general workings (if you know what I mean). Of
course, this is just conjecture from the way it seems to go rather
than definitive knowledge.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOn2utznkJKuSnc2gEQLkSACbBdGANmJszg+P6MntU9UjUL6UFh8AnROp
m2sLvX3M7ROz+is1+Pgzw2iJ
=EWOA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
