Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-31 Thread David Elliott
User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List:

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:29:25 +0100 GMT (31/07/02, 13:29 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test. ROTFLOL! You really *had* me laughing out loud on this one. But be fair, he didn't know that Syafril is the list admin and the test related to a

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Bernd Gauweiler
SH Please ignore, , What's all that junk with test messages posted lately? Can't people send a message to themselves or to a good buddy for test purposes? Thanks Bernd Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ:

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:09:57 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SH Please ignore, , What's all that junk with test messages posted lately? Can't people send a message to themselves or to a good buddy for test purposes? Sorry, I am too lazy to create new

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread ETM
You just ended up on a trash filter. Hello Syafril On Monday, July 29, 2002, you wrote Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at least now :-) Current Ver: 1.61

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Marcus Ohlstrm
On Monday, July 29, 2002, 16:26, Bernd Gauweiler wrote: I don't think you have a very strong argument here. You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test messages. I think you are missunderstanding. As seen in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Syafril is not testing

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bernd, @29 July 2002, 15:26 +0100 Bernd Gauweiler [BG] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Syafril Hermansyah: BG I don't think you have a very strong argument here. I disagree. moderator Strongly! /moderator BG You're

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Bernd, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:26:25 +0100 GMT (29/07/02, 21:26 +0700 GMT), Bernd Gauweiler wrote: BG I don't think you have a very strong argument here. BG You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test BG messages. There is no need to get annoyed. Syafril is the list

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread St - Musaic.Net
Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at least now :-) WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!! / St Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe:

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread St - Musaic.Net
WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!! ...St would like to disappear somewhere under the North Pole... / St Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:06:09 +0200 St - Musaic.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at least now :-) WHAT!?! FUCK IT!!! Do you want me to completely banned you from TB! list ? --

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ETM, @29 July 2002, 10:33 -0400 (15:33 UK time) ETM [E] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Syafril Hermansyah: Sorry, I am too lazy to create new $listname which have actually same setting as TBUDL has, no time for it... at

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:19:11 +0100 Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ...] I suggest you change your trash filter to filter test subjects but *not* Syafril. You may miss important service announcements. Not so important for anyone who not using upper 127 character set. For now, I

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread ETM
I had to go to my archived OE mail to find the welcome letter (never been successful in importing 3 gig of OE6 into TB) and did find this at the very end of the Welcome Letter sent to me in December of last year. I indeed apologize for suggesting he has been delegated to the trash folder.

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Bernd! On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 5:01:44 PM you wrote: Common sense, courtesy and good manners dictate, at least, to phrase such message differently, including a brief (!) statement as to why such test message is unavoidable. First of all the subject tells it ALL - like you want.

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello St! On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 5:09:25 PM you wrote: ...St would like to disappear somewhere under the North Pole... Because you got it wrong completely or just because Syafril is the last person to not send test messages? Is it only the quite nice weather now - or the really bad

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:29:11 +0200 Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ...] Is it only the quite nice weather now - or the really bad one last week - that seems to deteriorate our manners lately (mine included)? Maybe it is. Last week Philip Hazel from Cambridge Univ. UK (author of Exim