Re[2]: Which Anti-Spam (other than bayesit).

Hi Michael, On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 14:24 your local time, which was 22:24 my local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote; MLW It has got to be SpamPal. Free and everything you say, except not a MLW plug-in. I've decided to give SpamPal ago, and it seems to be working well, but I'm having a

Which Anti-Spam (other than bayesit).

Hi fellow users, I've been using the bayesit plug-in for quite a few months now and it was seamless. But, things aren't so effective now and I've decided to potentially look elsewhere for my anti-spam solution. Programs I've looked at so far include (in not particular order); 1 - K9 2 -

Re: Which Anti-Spam (other than bayesit).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cannot find a quick template TidySub Hello Chris, On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 , at 22:19:27[GMT +0100](which was 2:19 PM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): CW 1 - Ideally, I'd like a plug-in as it's one less program to run, but this CW

Re: Which Anti-Spam (other than bayesit).

Hi Chris, On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 22:19 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote; CW My requirements are as follows; CW 1 - Ideally, I'd like a plug-in as it's one less program to run, but this CW doesn't seem to be the case CW 2 - I'd like it to mark somewhere that the mail is suspected as

Re[2]: Which Anti-Spam (other than bayesit).

Hi Michael, On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 14:24 your local time, which was 22:24 my local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote; CW 3 - Must support TLS connections MLW It has got to be SpamPal. Free and everything you say, except not a MLW plug-in. Looks good, but requires something such as stunnel