Re: [TCP] Ending use of end-user

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Johnson
Actually, I was the one who suggested something like, person doing the scanning which is what I thought the original poster was trying to say. Scanner settings seems like it refers to hardware. In Sean's use of names, wouldn't that get confusing in the case of multiple people with different

Re: [TCP] Ending use of end-user

2006-11-24 Thread Sean Hower
In Sean's use of names, wouldn't that get confusing in the case of multiple people with different roles? Uma (the network admin) and John (the user) could be ambiguous without their titles. I can see where actors could help solidify some concepts, but I don't think they would be the best in

Re: [TCP] documentation as flowcharts

2006-11-24 Thread John Posada
So, I've been playng around with the idea of using flowcharts instead of numbered steps in documentation. It seems like it would make complicated procedures, with multiple options, easier to follow. The drawback, of course, is that it's not a tool people would be familiar with--except in

Re: [TCP] documentation as flowcharts

2006-11-24 Thread Gene Kim-Eng
I don't think it's such a radical idea. Just look at the flip charts on some copy machines for existing examples. The stumbler would be if you need to insert a note or safety warning or if your reader wants to acquire any knowledge beyond what Pavlov's dog would need to know to get to the last

Re: [TCP] documentation as flowcharts

2006-11-24 Thread John Posada
If the individual steps are complex, I feel that scrunching them into small flowchart boxes or making the flowchart boxes large would not help. If the steps are numerous but the complexity of each step is small, then a flowchart really shouldn't be used in place of the procedure, but