[tcpdump-workers] Automatic report from sources (tcpdump libpcap htdocs) between 08.06.2004 - 09.06.2004 GMT

2004-06-09 Thread Automatic cvs log generator /tcpdump/bin/makelog
CVS log entries from 08.06.2004 (Tue) 09:06:44 - 09.06.2004 (Wed) 09:06:31 GMT
=
Summary by authors
=
Author: hannes
File: tcpdump/print-lspping.c; Revisions: 1.3

=
Log entries
=
Description:
add support for the LDP_IPV4, LDP_IPV6  BGP_IPV4 subTLVs inside the target FEC TLV
Modified files:
File: tcpdump/print-lspping.c; Revision: 1.3;
Date: 2004/06/09 05:14:42; Author: hannes; Lines:  (+60 -6)
=
Summary of modified files
=
File: tcpdump/print-lspping.c
Revisions: 1.3
Authors: hannes (+60 -6)
-- 
Automatic cron job from /tcpdump/bin/makelog
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


[tcpdump-workers] Unexpected primitive ack DL_UNITDATA_IND

2004-06-09 Thread Gordon Tyler
Hi,

I have an application which uses libpcap 0.7.2 to monitor network
traffic by tracking the size of IP packets as well as their source and
destination. One of our QA people just encountered a rather odd error on
Solaris 8 which we have never seen before:

  recv_ack: info: Unexpected primitive ack DL_UNITDATA_IND

Does anybody know what this means? It seems to have occurred while
calling pcap_open_live (snaplen is sizeof(struct ip) + sizeof(struct
ether_header), promisc is 1, to_ms is 100).

Thanks,
Gordon

--
Gordon Tyler (Software Developer)
Quest Software http://java.quest.com/
260 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5A 4L5, Canada
Voice: 416-643-4846 | Fax: 416-594-1919
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


Re: [tcpdump-workers] Unexpected primitive ack DL_UNITDATA_IND

2004-06-09 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 9, 2004, at 1:58 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
On the surface I wouldn't think so - simply attaching to a PPA I don't 
think means traffic could arrive - however, if one has attached, and 
then binds to a SAP, then traffic could indeed start arriving.  
(Il-informed guesstimation, and hopefully I'm recalling the correct 
distinction between attach and bind)
Well, we *are* doing an info request after binding, so perhaps it might 
happen then.

I'm not sure why we're doing that; it dates back to libpcap 0.4.  Do 
you know of any reason why the dl_mac_type from an info request 
before binding to a SAP might be different from the dl_mac_type from 
a request after binding to a SAP?

-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.