--- CVS-Latest/pcap.c Wed Oct 17 17:52:41 2007
+++ pcap.c Tue Nov 06 15:04:27 2007
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@
int
pcap_setmintocopy(pcap_t *p, int size)
{
- return p->setintocopy_op(p, size);
+ return p->setmintocopy_op(p, size);
}
static int
--gv
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Checked in on HEAD and the libpcap_1_0 branch.
Thanks!
GV
- Original Message -
From: "Gisle Vanem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tcpdump-workers"
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 6:04 AM
Subject: [tcpdump-workers] typo in pcap.c
--- CVS-Latest/pcap.c Wed Oct 17 17:52:41 2007
+++ pcap.
At the risk of being annoying, before going out with the great and mighty
libpcap 1.0, would it be possible to fix the website?
"Mailing lists" section
- the archive at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/ is broken (it stops
in dec2006 and even the 2006 links are broken)
- the link to the mai
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patches for wlan filtering
On Nov 5, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I plan to compare this with the old version with the three possible
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I think I found the problem:
Yup, I just discovered that myself.
I've checked in a change that fixes it to do
(000) ldb [3]
(001) lsh #8
(002) tax
(003) ldb [2]
(004) or x
(005) st M[0]
(006) tax
(007) txa
(008) add #24
(009) st M
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I already noticed that the new BPF code doesn't check the
link-type in the PPI header properly: the check against the linktype
should be done before checking if the frame is a data frame.
Should any packets with a linktype other than DLT_IEEE802_11_RADIO pass
the filt
Any thoughts as to how to deal with false checksum failure reports for outbound
traffic being sniffed on a system with ChecKsum Offload (CKO)? It seems that
linux has a flag they can set when capturing the packet that would tell us, not
sure what other platforms might have - there it might be n
[new BPF code, CVS snapshot. Not working]
(000) ldb [3]
(001) lsh #8
(002) tax
(003) ldb [2]
(004) or x
(005) st M[0]
(006) tax
(007) txa
(008) add #24
(009) st M[1]
(010) ldb [x + 0]
(011) jset #0x8 jt 12 jf 17
(012) jset #0x4
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patches for wlan filtering
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I already noticed that the new BPF code doesn't check the
link-type in the PPI header properl
It seems to work ok.
Thanks!
GV
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patches for wlan filtering
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I think I found the problem:
Yup, I just discovered that m
Hi
As Gianluca pointed out, the web page has certainly some things that
need to be changed or improved.
I think the web is currently a mess so I have made a few changes:
-> All sections were restructured.
-> Added section "Contents"
-> Clean up of section "Documentation" + 1 tutorial added: "T
- Original Message -
From: "Luis Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: [tcpdump-workers] Changes to the web-page
Hi
As Gianluca pointed out, the web page has certainly some things that
need to be changed or improved.
I think the web is c
On Nov 6, 2007 2:03 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any thoughts as to how to deal with false checksum failure reports for
> outbound
> traffic being sniffed on a system with ChecKsum Offload (CKO)? It seems that
> linux has a flag they can set when capturing the packet that would tel
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Luis Martin wrote:
> Hi
>
> As Gianluca pointed out, the web page has certainly some things that
> need to be changed or improved.
>
> I think the web is currently a mess so I have made a few changes:
>
> -> All sections were restructured.
>
> -> Added section "Contents"
Harley Stenzel wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007 2:03 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any thoughts as to how to deal with false checksum failure reports for outbound
traffic being sniffed on a system with ChecKsum Offload (CKO)? It seems that
linux has a flag they can set when capturing the pack
On Nov 7, 2007 12:54 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harley Stenzel wrote:
> > On Nov 6, 2007 2:03 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Any thoughts as to how to deal with false checksum failure reports for
> >>outbound
> >>traffic being sniffed on a system with ChecKsum O
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
>
> I would probably get rid of the old releases, putting them in an
> archive folder (like I do for WinPcap). Also, I would rename the
> "TCPDUMP 3.9 / LIBPCAP 0.9" section specifying the specific version
> 3.9.8/0.9.8. (The current title is kinda confusing for me).
>
I ag
17 matches
Mail list logo
