Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?

2020-03-22 Thread Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On 22/03/2020 18:29, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote: > 5) Treat rpcap as "remote procedure call for libpcap" and put it under the > the-tcpdump-group team, and put pcap under the pcapng team as per the same > reason as 4). Ok. --- End Message ---

Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?

2020-03-22 Thread Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Mar 21, 2020, at 2:38 PM, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote: > On Mar 21, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers > wrote: > >> The options I see are: > > 4) add a new team for rpcap, as it's a protocol rather than a file format, > and thus only indirect

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-dev] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?

2020-03-22 Thread Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Mar 22, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: > I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful. > There were not very interested in defining a file format... They've done so in the past: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1761 (and h

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-dev] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?

2020-03-22 Thread Michael Tuexen via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- > On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote: >> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team: >> https://github.com/pcapng > >> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a >> "the-tcpdump-group" te