--- Begin Message ---
On Jul 17, 2022, at 3:39 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> IMO it is safe to drop support for OSes lacking native IPv6 support.
Yeah. Back when IPv6 support was added to tcpdump, it was an experimental new
technology and the configure script had to figure out which of several
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:30 PM Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote:
>
> Should we care about it, or should we just drop support for OSes lacking
> native IPv6 support in 5.0?
IMO it is safe to drop support for OSes lacking native IPv6
--- Begin Message ---
On Jul 17, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail
wrote:
> Remain some stuff about 'struct in6_addr'. Any need to keep them?
>
> $ git grep -l 'struct in6_addr'
> CMakeLists.txt
> cmakeconfig.h.in
> config.h.in
> configure
> configure.ac
> netdissect-stdinc.h
That's
--- Begin Message ---
On 17/07/2022 19:57, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2022, at 10:10 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers
> wrote:
>
>> The current nd_ipv4 and nd_ipv6 types were added in 2017 for alignment
>> reasons.
>>
>> Since then,
>> most of the 'struct in_addr' were
--- Begin Message ---
On Jul 17, 2022, at 10:10 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers
wrote:
> The current nd_ipv4 and nd_ipv6 types were added in 2017 for alignment
> reasons.
>
> Since then,
> most of the 'struct in_addr' were replaced by 'nd_ipv4',
> most of the 'struct in6_addr'
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
The current nd_ipv4 and nd_ipv6 types were added in 2017 for alignment reasons.
Since then,
most of the 'struct in_addr' were replaced by 'nd_ipv4',
most of the 'struct in6_addr' were replaced by 'nd_ipv6'.
Remain:
pflog.h:110:struct in_addr v4;
