On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 09:53:38 -0400
Michael Richardson wrote:
> The entire openwrt thread is at:
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-March/042499.html
> continuing at:
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-April/042521.html
>
>
> Daniel Golle
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:06 AM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Bill Fenner wrote:
> > mcr suggested:
> >> I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.
>
> > The creation of a tarball and its signature gives a place to hang
> one's hat
> > about origin of code -
Guy Harris wrote:
> If so, do we
> 1) require people to have autotools installed and run ./autogen.sh
> or
> 2) generate the configure scripts on some standard platform and check it
in
3) stop using autoconf, cmake only.
___
--- Begin Message ---
On 01/04/2024 20:18, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2024, at 6:53 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.
>
> I.e., replace:
>
> to get {libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice} version X.Y.Z, download
>
On Apr 1, 2024, at 6:53 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.
I.e., replace:
to get {libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice} version X.Y.Z, download
{libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice}-X.Y.Z.tar.{compression-suffix}
with
to get
Bill Fenner wrote:
> mcr suggested:
>> I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.
> The creation of a tarball and its signature gives a place to hang one's
hat
> about origin of code - "someone with the right key claims that this
tarball
> genuinely reflects
mcr suggested:
> I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.
The creation of a tarball and its signature gives a place to hang one's hat
about origin of code - "someone with the right key claims that this tarball
genuinely reflects what the project wants to distribute". Is there a
The entire openwrt thread is at:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-March/042499.html
continuing at:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-April/042521.html
Daniel Golle wrote:
> However, after reading up about the details of this backdoored
