Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC] Addition of link-layer header types for PCI, PCI-X, and PCI-Express

2020-10-25 Thread Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 2:05 AM Guy Harris wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2020, at 1:56 PM, Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers > wrote: > > > I'm working on a project that plans to store PCI and PCI-Express > > packets in the pcapng format as that's the most appropriate storage > >

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC] Addition of link-layer header types for PCI, PCI-X, and PCI-Express

2020-10-25 Thread Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Oct 21, 2020, at 1:56 PM, Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers wrote: > I'm working on a project that plans to store PCI and PCI-Express > packets in the pcapng format as that's the most appropriate storage > format and I really rather not roll something custom. > > As

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC] Addition of link-layer header types for PCI, PCI-X, and PCI-Express

2020-10-24 Thread Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 5:32 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Aki Van Ness wrote: > > Yeah it might be possible to use something like a single DLT. The issue > > I can possibly forsee with that is PCI, PCI-X, and PCI-Express are all > > slightly different

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC] Addition of link-layer header types for PCI, PCI-X, and PCI-Express

2020-10-23 Thread Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:38 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Aki Van Ness via tcpdump-workers wrote: > > I'm working on a project that plans to store PCI and PCI-Express > > packets in the pcapng format as that's the most appropriate storage > > format and I