Re: [Cryptech Tech] Alpha status

Nice! Waiting from other news from battlefield! dol@ с iPad > 12 мая 2016 г., в 10:44, Fredrik Thulin написал(а): > >> On torsdag 12 maj 2016 kl. 11:19:16 CEST Fredrik Thulin wrote: >> We've started the bring up of the Alpha board. It is alive! >> >> Power levels and

Re: [Cryptech Tech] Alpha status

This is fantastic! Excellent job all :) On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Fredrik Thulin wrote: > Given the encouraging results from today I can't be anything but optimistic > =). Same! :) ___ Tech mailing list Tech@cryptech.is

Re: [Cryptech Tech] Security assurance

On 2016-05-13 at 18:49, Peter Stuge wrote: Think of Cryptech more as a toolkit than a finished product. Even a toolkit needs to take these issues into considerations. I've also spent some time thinking about is, and I'm looking forward to discus this further with Olle and others. How we

Re: [Cryptech Tech] Security assurance

o...@nxs.se wrote: > OpenHSM Think of Cryptech more as a toolkit than a finished product. I don't believe Cryptech will develop an OpenHSM product, but I *do* believe that all Cryptech work can be leveraged by someone who wants to create such a product. One could consider Cryptech almost an

Re: [Cryptech Tech] Alpha FMC testing

Skickat från min iPhone > 13 maj 2016 kl. 15:59 skrev Fredrik Thulin : > > Hi all > > The FMC communication between the FPGA and the ARM tests out OK for at least > 200 million read/writes of 32 bit words (@ 90 MHz). I'll set it up for a > longer test run over the

[Cryptech Tech] Security assurance

Hi! I have been thinking about helping out for a while now, but have had trouble finding the time. One thing I believe the project is sorely lacking is a strategy for putting the "S" in HSM. What makes an HSM "secure"? I would argue that ultimately it means it should be suitable for the purpose