Re: Please test this diff on as many acpi systems as possible

2009-06-09 Thread Dan Harnett
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:23:34PM -0600, g...@gwk.ca wrote: And it works better if you send the actual diff you would like tested sorry about this, but please test this one. It appears to be fine running on a ThinkPad T61 and X61s. The max speed is listed a little funny. There is the max and

Re: ACPI C-States diff

2009-06-09 Thread Marco Peereboom
Can we get some tests on this? On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 02:48:24PM -0500, jor...@peereboom.us wrote: Sending out an initial attempt at implementing C-states for APCI CPUs. The C-states are used to implement the CPU idle loop per CPU. Please send dmesgs of booting using this patch. Index:

Re: ksh vi mode werase (^W) handling

2009-06-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 06:49:06AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: Hmm. It's not doing that for me. Both 'b' and 'B' seem to be working, with 'b' using '/' and other punctuation, and 'B' only caring about ' '. Can you see if you have to do anything special to break it? Of course I have 1

Re: ACPI C-States diff

2009-06-09 Thread Gabriel Kihlman
jor...@peereboom.us writes: Sending out an initial attempt at implementing C-states for APCI CPUs. The C-states are used to implement the CPU idle loop per CPU. Please send dmesgs of booting using this patch. Panics on a thinkpad t400 amd64 SMP I see this part of the boot log on my display

Re: Please test this diff on as many acpi systems as possible

2009-06-09 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
Hey there, From g...@gwk.ca Sun Jun 7 01:54:35 2009 This will call the ACPI _PDC method, normally this ins't implemented on systems with amd processors but the acpi spec says that we should try and evaulate it anyway. In addition to the diff that was