On 03/05/12 21:10, Erik Lax wrote:
On 3/2/12 5:09 PM, Gabriel Linder wrote:
Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes on rdomain 0 and prio
0, I guess that's not intended ?
I think you're right. And if so, the same problem seem to exist for
the ftp-proxy (filter.c) as well. I guess this is
On 2011/01/22 19:40, Gleydson Soares wrote:
can anyone test this diff? your feedback will be most welcome
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:51:11AM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
hi,
- ipv6 support for tftp client.
based on an old itojun's diff.
weerd@ pointed out this old diff - here's a
just to confirm, I've seen this, this is a problem and we're
discussing how to fix the offenders (it's not just relayd)
* Gabriel Linder lin...@jeuxvideo.com [2012-03-02 18:26]:
Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes on rdomain 0 and prio
0, I guess that's not intended ?
Index:
On 2012/03/06 10:20, Gabriel Linder wrote:
On 03/05/12 21:10, Erik Lax wrote:
On 3/2/12 5:09 PM, Gabriel Linder wrote:
Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes on rdomain 0 and
prio 0, I guess that's not intended ?
I think you're right. And if so, the same problem seem to exist for
the
ftp-proxy has all the code to support on rdomain feature
in place, just not used. the change below uses an rdomain
obtained via the SO_RTABLE socket option of the accepted
socket. OK?
Index: filter.c
===
RCS file:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:28:43PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
ftp-proxy has all the code to support on rdomain feature
in place, just not used. the change below uses an rdomain
obtained via the SO_RTABLE socket option of the accepted
socket. OK?
Looks good to me.
Index: filter.c
This simple diff makes pkg_add and pkg_delete include their PID when
logging to syslog. This is useful when trying to determine whether
several packages were added (or removed) by the same pkg_add (or
pkg_delete) process.
Here is some sample output:
Mar 3 22:15:17 obsd-amd64 pkg_add[3530]:
