Re: fix disable lidsuspend on shutdown by init(8)

2012-09-22 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> Only concern I have is whether #include could have >> side-effects on architectures I don't know of (which, admittedly, is >> quite a few). > > it is a bad idea to pull machine/ header files. It's also the documented method of getting the

Re: fix disable lidsuspend on shutdown by init(8)

2012-09-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Only concern I have is whether #include could have > side-effects on architectures I don't know of (which, admittedly, is > quite a few). it is a bad idea to pull machine/ header files.

Re: fix disable lidsuspend on shutdown by init(8)

2012-09-22 Thread Alexander Hall
Ping, ping, on this essentially +1 -1 diff? Only concern I have is whether #include could have side-effects on architectures I don't know of (which, admittedly, is quite a few). /Alexander On 09/12/12 00:43, Alexander Hall wrote: This pulls in machine/cpu.h so we can see CPU_LIDSUSPEND if

Re: proto cksum madness

2012-09-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/09/22 13:29, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote: > On 21-9-2012 23:40, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > $ ifconfig vr0 hwfeatures|head -2 > > vr0: flags=8b43 > > mtu 1500 > > hwfeatures=8017 > > > > No problems noticed yet. (this is running i386). > > > > $ ifconfig vlan6 hwfeatures|head -2 > > v

Re: proto cksum madness

2012-09-22 Thread Camiel Dobbelaar
On 21-9-2012 23:40, Stuart Henderson wrote: > $ ifconfig vr0 hwfeatures|head -2 > vr0: flags=8b43 mtu > 1500 > hwfeatures=8017 > > No problems noticed yet. (this is running i386). > > $ ifconfig vlan6 hwfeatures|head -2 > vlan6: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > hwfeatures=0<> > > Is it rig