Re: tftp-proxy(8) with nat-to

2013-12-20 Thread Florian Obser
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:17:08PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: im glad you wrote a diff rather than simply complain that nat and tftp doesnt work. the moving parts generally look good to me apart from the struct src_addr and getopt chunks. please use sockaddr_storage instead of sockaddr in

Re: security(8) check maildir as well as mailbox permissions

2013-12-20 Thread Joerg Jung
Am 20.12.2013 um 08:48 schrieb David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au: On 20 Dec 2013, at 2:56 am, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote: Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote: * Craig R. Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk [2013-12-19 10:18]: On 2013-12-18 Wed 20:48 PM |, J??r??mie

Re: tftp-proxy(8) with nat-to

2013-12-20 Thread David Gwynne
you need to change len to be sizeof(saddr) instead of sizeof(struct sockaddr) in unprivproc_pop. likewise, the memcpy in source_addresses needs to use res-ai_addrlen instead of sizeof(struct sockaddr). with those fixes its ok by me. On 20 Dec 2013, at 9:12 pm, Florian Obser flor...@openbsd.org

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-20 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote: This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too. Haven't forgotten about