Generally, when a NA is received we check if the receiving interface
has the target address advertised and if it's the case we warn about
duplicate addresses and bail.
But in the case of a carp interface in BACKUP state it's different. In
this case we have a hack that sets the ifa to NULL and
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:49:21 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The *.y file is the source code. the .c and .h files it generates are not
the source code, but an intermediate language.
To stetch this to the limit, we should be shipping cpp-processed files, for
maximum portability.
NO WAY! .y
gdb (gdb 6.3) knows about threads but core dumps half the time
and is 10 years old.
egdb (gdb 7.6) does not work right with multithreaded programs. It
sees only one thread.
Neither supports set scheduler-locking.
Is there any good option for debugging a multithreaded program?
I'm running
It's basically impossible to support something when the actual code
being compiled varies drastically from system to system.
It is socially irresponsible to provide something like sudo or ssh for
systems that old and fundamentally vulnerable, without any updates or
any security at all.
You are
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 17:28, John Carr wrote:
gdb (gdb 6.3) knows about threads but core dumps half the time
and is 10 years old.
egdb (gdb 7.6) does not work right with multithreaded programs. It
sees only one thread.
Neither supports set scheduler-locking.
Is there any good
From: Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:50:53 -0700
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will
be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other
words,
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:28:24 -0500
From: John Carr j...@mit.edu
gdb (gdb 6.3) knows about threads but core dumps half the time
and is 10 years old.
egdb (gdb 7.6) does not work right with multithreaded programs. It
sees only one thread.
I'm still planning to merge the changes for
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014, at 13:56, Fabian Raetz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:32:15PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:23:18 +0100
From: Fabian Raetz fabian.ra...@gmail.com
Hmm, my cleanup was based on the version you send out on December
31st. Can you send
