Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals. While it is OK to
increase the size it should be taken away from other fields in some whay.
An option would be to drop the OutQ since that field has only limited
value IMO.
ping?
This is a fix for OpenSSL tickets #977 and #3213, loosely based on patch from
Reuben Thomas from #3213.
---
src/apps/s_client.c |5 +++--
src/apps/s_server.c | 10 ++
src/apps/s_time.c |5 +++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals.
[...]
Agreed, that's not good.
While it is OK to
increase the size it should be taken away from other
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Florian Zumbiehl fl...@florz.de wrote:
ping?
This is a fix for OpenSSL tickets #977 and #3213, loosely based on patch
from
Reuben Thomas from #3213.
Hmm, what a mess. The smime and ocsp subcommands use an internal
function setup_verify() to get the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Justus Baumgartner medde...@gmail.com
wrote:
Add omitted reference to execvpe().
The second argument of execvpe() is referenced at the beginning of the
fifth paragraph,
but no mention of execvpe().
...
The
.Fn execle
-function also specifies the
Hi,
[...]
Is this an area where the current behavior cannot be used safely? No.
Indeed, using CAs in circumstances where OpenSSL doesn't may create
security issues for existing scripts using the openssl command.
*If* using the compiled in paths is correct, then I would think using the
Hello,
First, I have a question regarding implementation of GOST public key
cryptography.
Is it OK to add dependency GOST = EC? It will allow me to reuse EC
infrastructure
for GOST public key cryptography (GOST R 34.10-2001 and -2012 use ECC)?
Second. I have published a preview of cypher/message
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Florian Zumbiehl fl...@florz.de wrote:
Is this an area where the current behavior cannot be used safely? No.
Indeed, using CAs in circumstances where OpenSSL doesn't may create
security issues for existing scripts using the openssl command.
*If* using
On 2014/07/27 11:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals. While it is OK to
increase the size it should be taken away from other fields in some whay.
An option would be to drop the OutQ
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 03:36:06PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/07/27 11:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals. While it is OK to
increase the size it should be taken away
Hi,
Ha! Ain't this code great! You're correct that I misread it. So right
now:
* If you don't specify either option, no CAs will be available
* if you specify -CAfile and it can't be loaded, then no CAs will be
available
* if you specify -CApath and either it's the zero-length path ()
is there a reason why this check should be done twice?
/usr/include/string.h:117:
#if __POSIX_VISIBLE = 200809
char*stpcpy(char *__restrict, const char *__restrict);
char*stpncpy(char *__restrict, const char *__restrict, size_t);
char*strndup(const char *, size_t);
size_t
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 03:36:06PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/07/27 11:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals. While it is OK to
increase the size it should be taken away
First, I have a question regarding implementation of GOST public key
cryptography.
Is it OK to add dependency GOST = EC? It will allow me to reuse EC
infrastructure
for GOST public key cryptography (GOST R 34.10-2001 and -2012 use ECC)?
Yes. We aren't fond of unnecessary ifdefs, and EC
On 2014/07/27 17:24, Gregor Best wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 03:36:06PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/07/27 11:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Not a big fan since this makes the bgpctl show output no longer fit 80
chars and so will wrap lines on default terminals. While it is OK to
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
First, I have a question regarding implementation of GOST public key
cryptography.
Is it OK to add dependency GOST = EC? It will allow me to reuse EC
infrastructure
for GOST public key cryptography (GOST R 34.10-2001 and
16 matches
Mail list logo
