myx_intr should be able to run without a lock, except in teh situation where
are bringing an interface down.
this interlock was done by serialising the changes myx_down and myx_intr needed
to do with a mutex, but for the many millions and billions of interrupts you
get when you're actually usin
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Until somebody shows me a specific list of roff implementations
that do so, i challenge that statement as urban legend, and the
advice to use \- for flags as cargo cult programming.
The reason lintian complains about this is that Debian had problems with
- rendering as a u
Hi,
I had some problems running syslogd on a machine where another
process had a 514 socket bound to a specific address. As this is
not a real conflict, I think syslogd should bind *:514 with
SO_REUSEADDR. This is already the case with all other sockets.
ok?
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/sysl
> Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Hello tech@,
> >
> > I took a quick glance at ksh and one of the first things I noticed was
> > that it uses some sanatizing code on argv. When looking at execve(2) I
> > see that EINVAL or EFAULT are returned when argv isn't properly
> > formatted. I've also veri
Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> I took a quick glance at ksh and one of the first things I noticed was
> that it uses some sanatizing code on argv. When looking at execve(2) I
> see that EINVAL or EFAULT are returned when argv isn't properly
> formatted. I've also verified this quic
Michael McConville wrote:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Michael McConville wrote:
> > > Also, why is fs on line 390 cast to char* when afree() takes void*?
> >
> > this code is older than void. and NULL apparently. please remove the casts
> > too.
>
> Does this look good? I had to leave one cast becau
Ted Unangst wrote:
> Michael McConville wrote:
> > Also, why is fs on line 390 cast to char* when afree() takes void*?
>
> this code is older than void. and NULL apparently. please remove the casts
> too.
Does this look good? I had to leave one cast because the freed pointer
is a const.
Index:
I think we can relax the path restriction if there's no restriction on
command.
Index: doas.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/doas/doas.c,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -r1.39 doas.c
--- doas.c 27 Aug 2015 16:31:02 -
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:47:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The rtvalid() function checks if the route entry rt is still valid and
> can be used. Cached entries that are no longer valid should be released
> by calling rtfree().
I like it. As it does some checks and returns
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 03:35:21PM -0400, Peter Piwowarski wrote:
> This patch replaces some literal '-' with '\-' in examples for sndio-
> related manpages. Certain roff implementations may render '-' as a
> hyphen (unicode U+2010) rather than a minus sign (unicode U+002D or ascii
> 0x2D); while
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 08:01:02PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> As suggested by deraadt@ and tobias@ it might be better to use the *return*
> statement instead of exit(3)
> inside the *main* function, to let the stack protector do its work.
>
> This diff removes such calls in all *src/bin/
Hello,
Dilli Paudel in Oracle was playing with PF enough to find funny glitch.
He used rule as follows:
block in on vnic4 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any route-to 172.16.1.1@vnic5
Many people expect the route-to action is somewhat futile as 'block' action
takes precedence here, so packet gets
Hello,
attached my work in progress on checksumming support for softraid
RAID1. Currently it does just:
- computation of checksums (crc32)
- verification of checksums
- signal bad checksum to console and to sensors
E.g.:
$ sysctl hw.sensors.softraid0
hw.sensors.softraid0.raw0=0 (sd0f), OK
hw.sens
Hello tech@,
I took a quick glance at ksh and one of the first things I noticed was
that it uses some sanatizing code on argv. When looking at execve(2) I
see that EINVAL or EFAULT are returned when argv isn't properly
formatted. I've also verified this quickly by a small PoC and in
sys/kern/
Hi all,
This patch adds the usb control request validity checks
already present in ugen(4) to usb(4).
Grant
Index: usb.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c,v
retrieving revision 1.107
diff -u -p -r1.107 usb.c
--- usb.c 1
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I want to remove this chunked introduce in r7.19 in 1991 by sklower@
> because it no longer makes any sense, it is a layer violation and
> does no play well with rt refcounting.
>
> When this chunk was introduced rtrequest1(RTM_DEL
Michael McConville wrote:
> Also, why is fs on line 390 cast to char* when afree() takes void*?
this code is older than void. and NULL apparently. please remove the casts
too.
On 08/31/15 07:36, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Michael Reed(m.r...@mykolab.com) on 2015.08.30 14:58:35 -0400:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If ntpd is run with the -n flag, and /etc/ntpd.conf is parsed without
>> error, then "Configuration OK" is printed. I don't think this is
>> particularly useful, as both a l
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> I reconsidered it. It does not make sense to truncate the hostname
> in the config at some character from a list. Just take whatever
> the user specified as progname or hostname.
>
> ok?
visual ok + slightly tested
OK semari
TL;DR - a native hypervisor is coming. stay tuned.
For the last few months, I've been working on a hypervisor for OpenBSD.
The idea for this started a few years ago, and after playing around with
it from time to time, things really started to take shape around the
time of the Brisbane hackathon ea
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Ulf Brosziewski <
ulf.brosziew...@t-online.de> wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 01:13 PM, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Some weeks ago a change was made in pms to support Synaptics touchpads
>>> that
On 25/08/15(Tue) 12:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe
> > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big
> > step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if peo
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Ulf Brosziewski <
ulf.brosziew...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> The tap-and-drag gesture doesn't work reliably with the ALPS touchpads
> supported by pms. To make it work, it is necessary to start dragging
> immediately with the second touch, which doesn't always succeed
On 25/08/15(Tue) 13:01, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I want to remove this chunked introduce in r7.19 in 1991 by sklower@
> because it no longer makes any sense, it is a layer violation and
> does no play well with rt refcounting.
>
> When this chunk was introduced rtrequest1(RTM_DELETE...) was *not*
On 30/08/15(Sun) 09:31, John L. Scarfone wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot stated:
> > That's good but the original design of allocating an xfer for every
> > usbd_transfer(9) call does not make much sense.
> >
> > You could allocate two xfers (one for read and o
Hello,
I'm fine with this change. It certainly posses no thread to SMP branch...
> * Initialise pd->pcksum for icmp6
>
> - ensures pcksum is set for all known checksummed protocols
> - later patches rely on this
may be this patch/change should be folded to patch, which
really ex
On 30 August 2015 at 15:44, Florian Obser wrote:
> RH0 has been deprecated for quite some time now in RFC 5095. It's
> quite useless on OpenBSD since our stack unconditionally drops packets
> with a RH0 header so you can't get the packet out anyway.
> And last but not least it might get in the way
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: "Ted Unangst"
> > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:38:45 -0400
> >
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > This diff is purely mechanical. This means that it also changes some
> > > pool_allocator_nointr into pool_allocator_single where the intention
> > > was to signal that the p
Michael Reed(m.r...@mykolab.com) on 2015.08.30 14:58:35 -0400:
> Hi all,
>
> If ntpd is run with the -n flag, and /etc/ntpd.conf is parsed without
> error, then "Configuration OK" is printed. I don't think this is
> particularly useful, as both a lack of an error message and an exit
> value of 0
Also, why is fs on line 390 cast to char* when afree() takes void*?
Index: emacs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/emacs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50 emacs.c
--- emacs.c 25 Mar 2015 12:10:52 - 1.50
+++ e
Hello Richard,
the code in patch looks good for the first glance. However it seems to me
the newly introduced pf_cksum_fixup*() are not called yet. Do you think you
can reshuffle changes between your set of patches a bit, so the newly
introduced functions will become alive (get called)?
Also I t
31 matches
Mail list logo