Re: let's get reference to state key back

2016-03-25 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, sorry I have not test patch, which I've sent earlier. I boot unpatched kernel... this is the fix one need. updated patch is further below. 8<---8<-8< diff -r 00f90fca186c src/sys/net/pf.c --- a/src/sys/net/pf.c Fri Mar 25 09:29:43 2016 +0100

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Miod Vallat
> maybe we could provide MaaS (man as a service, copyright eric@) > > if user issues `man` and the man page is not found locally, man > would transparently ssh to gu...@man.openbsd.org ? Doesn't Canonical own a patent on this?

Re: mpsafe aesni

2016-03-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Mike Belopuhov > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:33:25 +0100 > > On 24 March 2016 at 20:53, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Diff below makes aesni crypto "mpsafe". It adds a CRYPTOCAP_F_MPSAFE > > flag that makes the crypto framework dispatch to an

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Alexander Hall
Am I the only one that didn't take the proposal seriously? /Alexander On March 25, 2016 5:13:52 PM GMT+01:00, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> > $ ssh gu...@man.openbsd.org >> > >> > Welcome guest user to OpenBSD's online manual library. >> > >> > The only command available

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Am I the only one that didn't take the proposal seriously? Craig's bank hands out anonymous unix shell accounts so that people can read various public documents rather than using a web browser; I am guessing that is where this proposal comes from.

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > $ ssh gu...@man.openbsd.org > > > > Welcome guest user to OpenBSD's online manual library. > > > > The only command available is 'man'. > > > > (For help; type 'man man[ENTER]'.) > > > > $ So Craig, you think someone should take this risk?

Re: multitouch support again

2016-03-25 Thread Ulf Brosziewski
On 03/25/2016 01:53 PM, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: >>> Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if >>> not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Bob Beck
Now now, we can be more hipster than that.. a docker image that runs the man command for you after downloading all the openbsd man pages as a dependency - you can just deploy it automatically with vagrant and run it in AWS.. etc. After all, isn't there no simple command that can't be made better

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Gilles, Gilles Chehade wrote on Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:34:02PM +0100: > maybe we could provide MaaS (man as a service, copyright eric@) > > if user issues `man` and the man page is not found locally, man > would transparently ssh to gu...@man.openbsd.org ? Hilarious on so many levels...

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Craig Skinner wrote on Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:07:10AM +: > > On 2016-03-22 Tue 22:49 PM |, Bob Beck wrote: > > >> A few years back, Ingo moved it to the new mandoc based man.cgi, and > >> now we've actually moved

Re: www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi

2016-03-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Craig, Craig Skinner wrote on Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:07:10AM +: > On 2016-03-22 Tue 22:49 PM |, Bob Beck wrote: >> A few years back, Ingo moved it to the new mandoc based man.cgi, and >> now we've actually moved this to a dedicated place - "man.openbsd.org" > Superb. > > What's next? >

let's get reference to state key back

2016-03-25 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, this yet another patch, which got backed out in Jan. This time I'd like to commit change, which makes sure IP stack keeps reference to state key along the packet (mbuf). The change should not cause panics, but I'd like to ask testers to watch for memory leaks on state key pool (pfstkey):

Re: multitouch support again

2016-03-25 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > > Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if > > not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress > > in this area? I'm at a loss here.

Re: multitouch support again

2016-03-25 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if > not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress > in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I > cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains

Re: multitouch support again

2016-03-25 Thread Ulf Brosziewski
Again, my mail client insisted on the "flowed" text format, sorry. Here is a clean version of the diff. Index: src/wsconscomm.c === RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/driver/xf86-input-synaptics/src/wsconscomm.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff

Re: multitouch support again

2016-03-25 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 24/03/16(Thu) 22:34, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if > not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress > in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I > cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains the minimum > that