On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if > not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress > in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I > cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains the minimum > that technically makes sense. And as it just adds the basics, > a lot of things remain that could and possibly should be done > soon, 6.0 isn't far away here.
I've been running the previous version of your diff without problem. However, on my laptop (X2240) I can't figure out if the touchpad is supposed to support multitouch or not. I wanted to do more tests (comparing with Linux for instance) but I've lacked time so far. If you have some small test programs (or recipes based on xinput) to suggest I'll try that. Again, your work on this is much appreciated, even if it's true that we've not provided feedback... Thanks. > > > On 03/20/2016 06:18 PM, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > >I have been asked to prepare a less invasive version of > >the MT diffs I posted a week ago. Here it is. It doesn't > >delete wsmouse_input(). The old and the new infrastructure > >coexist in wsmouse, and only the touchpad drivers have been > >changed to use the new one. Except for a stylistic detail > >(s/timespeccpy/memcpy/), nothing else has changed, and the > >descriptions I added last week apply to this version as > >well (the synaptics diff, which needs the modified wsconsio.h, > >is the first one here, the rest is for the kernel). > > > >Tests have been made with an Elantech-v4 touchpad, an ALPS > >Glidepoint, and an old Synaptics touchpad. I couldn't test > >the older Elantech models, more recent Synaptics models, or > >models that run with hidmt or ubcmtp. (The December version > >had more tests, but this isn't exactly the same code anymore.) > > > > > >[...] -- Matthieu Herrb
pgphKg4PvBKaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
