Currently you can change a tun interface from being point to point to
being a broadcast interface. Why?
This cuts out the ability to change it. Note that the ioctl code is
shared by tap, so it still has IFF_BROADCAST code that gets run, you
should just not be able to change the flags, only read
this has reads from tun load the AF out of the data rather than point to
it, then has the switch statement compare to the swapped AF values.
ok?
Index: if_tun.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_tun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.184
I asked tsg about this before, IIRC it was intentionally omitted as it
wasn't considered finished. (For starters it could do with some plist smarts).
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 3 February 2019 21:22:58 Linda Lapinlampi wrote:
/usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/portgen supports "py" type, as seen in the
source code:
if ( $type eq 'p5' ) {
$o = OpenBSD::PortGen::Port::CPAN->new();
} elsif ( $type eq 'py' ) {
$o = OpenBSD::PortGen::Port::PyPI->new();
} elsif ( $type eq 'ruby' ) {
$o =
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:23:16PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/12/24 19:05, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > I've finally gotten our local patches applied to perl 5.28.1 and it now
> > could use some testing. I was trying to get a few more of my
> > architectures working, but I ran out
yes you are seeing the limitation of 6.4 unveil as mentioned at the bottom
of the man page. this should be fixed in current
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 03:29 Kristaps Dzonsons wrote:
> When I unveil(2), fts doesn't behave well. But only in a subtle way.
> Enclosed is a demonstration. I found
On 2018/12/24 19:05, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I've finally gotten our local patches applied to perl 5.28.1 and it now
> could use some testing. I was trying to get a few more of my
> architectures working, but I ran out of time and now I have to go visit
> family for the holidays so it's up to
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 17:19:07 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> On SPARC the address of the call instruction is placed in %o7 and a
> normal function return will jump to %o7 + 8, skipping the delay slot.
> The diff below changes the low-level libunwind code to take this into
> account.
Hi Pascal,
Pascal Stumpf wrote on Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 11:13:12AM +0100:
> That is not correct because [...]
Which illustrates yet again that getting good grades at school
doesn't imply real understanding; i dared to try and research the
matter anyway because i forgot that with pascal@, we have
When I unveil(2), fts doesn't behave well. But only in a subtle way.
Enclosed is a demonstration. I found this with openrsync, which unveils
before using fts_open to scan for files.
When run with a directory with only empty subdirectories or just files,
this works fine. But when run with a
Hi Ingo and Jason,
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 01:13:18 +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> oh well, these files are a mess, a random collection of funny
> and not so funny stuff... I dislike this one, too, for several
> reasons.
>
> 1. While "ad astra per aspera" sometimes occurs, the word
11 matches
Mail list logo
