I can test it this weekend. I have a Thinkpad T420.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:52 +0200
> Benjamin Baier wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is wip for a new sysctl that implements gpu throttling.
> > Only implemented for inteldrm righ
Hi all,
I posted this question to the OpenBSD bugs list last week, however
I have had no reply and it was suggested on IRC that I post to
openssh-unix-dev, however they suggested I post to tech instead.
So I must apologize if this is not appropriate.
For a reference here is my previous post to bu
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:52 +0200
Benjamin Baier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is wip for a new sysctl that implements gpu throttling.
> Only implemented for inteldrm right now, and tested on a single amd64
> laptop. Helps to keep the GPU/CPU cooler and save some energy.
>
> Most of the diff is for se
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 01:19:30PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Hi
>
> in anoncvs.html, if the user choose to use tgz sources instead of a
> checkout, the update examples won't work because no cvs server will be
> set without passing -d parameter to the cvs command.
>
> Not sure about the wordi
Hi
in anoncvs.html, if the user choose to use tgz sources instead of a
checkout, the update examples won't work because no cvs server will be
set without passing -d parameter to the cvs command.
Not sure about the wording, if a good english speaker can word it
better, go on :)
Index: build/mirro
Hi,
Thanks for the report!
This does not look correct.
TSC skew=-6129185140 drift=170
TSC skew=-6129184900 drift=-10
TSC skew=-6129184890 drift=-20
TSC skew=-6129184910 drift=30
TSC skew=-6129184910 drift=10
TSC skew=-6129184900 drift=20
TSC skew=-6129184910 drift=30
I'll be back with some pri
It is possible that a session is going down while peer->rpending (the flag
indicating that there is more data to process) is set. If that is
happening the session engine is spinning until the session comes back up
or the neighbor is removed.
Fix is obvious, clear the flag when the read buffer rbuf
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:12:11AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/06/19(Mon) 10:10, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > rt_ifa_add() and rt_ifs_del() confused rtableid and rtlabelid and so the
> > code does not correcly set RTAX_LABEL. It makes no sense to try to compare
> > rdoamin against if_rtlabeli
