On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:26:57AM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
I don't know our stance on Unix vs Un*x. I'll leave this to some
native speaker, like jmc@ who knows all about commas (and much more)
:-)
-Otto
I'll leave this to jmc or some other native speaker. S
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
ok?
Index: sys/dev/usb/files.usb
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/files.usb,v
retrieving revision 1.139
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.139 files.usb
--- sys/dev/usb/files.usb 7 Jun 2019 16:06:59 - 1.139
+++
PUSER has been used since the import of ___thrsleep(2) / librthread.
This value has been then copied to futex(2). No other tsleep(9) call
use this value. I'd like to stop using it to be able to differentiate
sleeping priorities that will be always < PUSER, to running priorities.
The only running
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
> request cor fomments
committed, thanks
request cor fomments
Index: uuid.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid.3,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 uuid.3
--- uuid.3 2 Oct 2018 10:55:39 - 1.6
+++ uuid.3 8 Jul 2019 21:15:27 -
@@ -207,4
Hi Patrick,
I tested all you patches with my integrated uvideo(4) device.
...
uvideo0 at uhub0 port 8 configuration 1 interface 0 "SunplusIT Inc Integrated
Camera" rev 2.01/54.20 addr 9
video0 at uvideo0
...
addr 09: 5986:2115 SunplusIT Inc, Integrated Camera
high speed, power 500 mA,
This is read(2)ing form a tty(4) device. More specifically,
only non-canonical mode. From X/Open 4.2:
MIN represents the minimum number of bytes that should be
received when the read() function returns successfully. TIME is
a timer of 0.1 second granularity that is used
Hello Yasuoka,
> Previous diff made src-node have a reference for the kif. My
> colleague pointed out that incrementing the reference count of the kif
> is required.
>
> ok?
>
very good catch, indeed. Thanks for taking care of it.
diff looks good to me.
OK sashan
On 26/06/19(Wed) 19:13, Christian Ludwig wrote:
> We have two variables with the same meaning. db_active is used in way
> more places, so let's nuke db_is_active.
Thanks for the cleanup!
> Now that db_active is in for a while already and not
> guarded by DDB anymore, take the opportunity to
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 10:44:42PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
>
> > I noticed one thing that bothered me and decided to look for other
> > things that bothered me. Changes were made without reference to the code
> > of the installation program and without checking that
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:36:05 +0200, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> while porting some NetBSD syscall tests to OpenBSD I noticed that the
> getgroups test is failing. Simply put:
>
> gid_t gidset[NGROUPS_MAX];
> getgroups(-1, gidset);
>
> This was fixed on NetBSD 8 years ago:
>
Hi,
while porting some NetBSD syscall tests to OpenBSD I noticed that the
getgroups test is failing. Simply put:
gid_t gidset[NGROUPS_MAX];
getgroups(-1, gidset);
This was fixed on NetBSD 8 years ago:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/kern_prot.c
> if (SCARG(uap,
12 matches
Mail list logo
