Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:15:47PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
> >
> > Index: forward.5
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/forward.5,v
> > retrieving revision 1.9
> > diff -u -p -r1.9 forward.5
> >
How's is this related to tech@?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:44:00AM +0530, sivasubramanian muthusamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an ordinary computer user, installed 6.8 without connecting to
> the Internet yet, (a friend and a technical expert recently advised me
> in a different context: do not
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 09:47:41PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:15:47PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
> > >
> > > Index: forward.5
> > > ===
> > > RCS file:
I am not sure about your use case but to myself, my computer is useless
these days without a connection.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 1:15 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy <
6.inter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an ordinary computer user, installed 6.8 without connecting to
> the Internet yet,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:26:48AM +0100, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 08:30:04AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:59:05PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
Hello,
I am an ordinary computer user, installed 6.8 without connecting to
the Internet yet, (a friend and a technical expert recently advised me
in a different context: do not expose your machine to the Internet-
don't know what that means)
OpenBSD intro says OpenBSD is secure by default. How
Hi.
The diff seems to work for the few people who tested it (thanks).
Anyone wants to ok this?
Eric.
Index: ca.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/ca.c,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -p -r1.37 ca.c
--- ca.c31 Dec
Hi,
A coworker of mine has made tests with LibreSSL [1] and found some
regressions. I took his test descriptions and created the following
automated regression test. In the repository he described his findings
in detail. I kept the numbers of the files and subtests in the target
names for now.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A coworker of mine has made tests with LibreSSL [1] and found some
> regressions. I took his test descriptions and created the following
> automated regression test. In the repository he described his findings
> in detail.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:26:48AM +0100, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 08:30:04AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:59:05PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 10 2021, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > >
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 08:30:04AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:59:05PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10 2021, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Which fields is the new lock protecting? Why isn't the KERNEL_LOCK()
> > > enough?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 05:35:07PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
> Note: the command 'smtp -h' only returns usage. Usage exits with '1'
> (I assume this is to satisfy the default case in switch (ch) in
> main()), even when called from the correct use of the '-h' flag,
> which I don't think is correct.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:30:11PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
>
> Index: table.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/table.5,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p -r1.11 table.5
> --- table.5 11 Aug 2019 13:00:57 -
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:29:02PM +, Larry Hynes wrote:
>
> Index: smtpd.conf.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5,v
> retrieving revision 1.256
> diff -u -p -r1.256 smtpd.conf.5
> --- smtpd.conf.5 27
14 matches
Mail list logo