Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:37:51AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> >> I wonder they were not buffered. But does it make sense to drop the
> >> most recent messages?
> >
> > The oldest message should be kept. In my experience you get most
> > information why
> On 8 Mar 2021, at 23:20, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> I hope to have addressed all issues.
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:50:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
>> This copyin() can also result in copying the buffer from userspace twice.
>> This might not be a problem with log data though.
>
>
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I hope to have addressed all issues.
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:50:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > This copyin() can also result in copying the buffer from userspace twice.
> > This might not be a problem with log data though.
>
> Is double copyin a problem? I
I hope to have addressed all issues.
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:50:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> This copyin() can also result in copying the buffer from userspace twice.
> This might not be a problem with log data though.
Is double copyin a problem? I think error != EFAULT should catch
all
Hi,
If you look at the output of "xauth list" on you favourite OpenBSD
machine you might get a bit scared, especially if you have an IPv6
enabled network or if you used to travel and connect to various
networks.
Most of the lines are there to allow TCP connexions to the IP adresss
of the machine
Miod Vallat wrote:
> > It would be better if it contained "trap" instructions. We still don't
> > have an ideal way of doing that tho.
>
> That would work, but that would make the code a bit more complicated.
> And I'm not sure it's worth doing anyway. Running into an unmapped page
> will
> I guess the rest of the page contains 0?
No, it contains a truncated copy of the sigcode.
> It would be better if it contained "trap" instructions. We still don't
> have an ideal way of doing that tho.
That would work, but that would make the code a bit more complicated.
And I'm not sure
I see I misunderstood, and this does what is desired.
Miod Vallat wrote:
> The code responsible for filling a page with repeated copies of the
> signal trampoline code assumes that PAGE_SIZE % sigfillsz == 0.
>
> While this is true on all currently supported OpenBSD platforms, this
> might not
I guess the rest of the page contains 0?
It would be better if it contained "trap" instructions. We still don't
have an ideal way of doing that tho.
Miod Vallat wrote:
> The code responsible for filling a page with repeated copies of the
> signal trampoline code assumes that PAGE_SIZE %
The code responsible for filling a page with repeated copies of the
signal trampoline code assumes that PAGE_SIZE % sigfillsz == 0.
While this is true on all currently supported OpenBSD platforms, this
might not be the case in the future (and isn't the case on some
no-longer official platforms).
this looks reasonable and fixes my problem
OK florian
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:01:34PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The last commit introduced an error in prefix_eligible(). For nexthops the
> logic is not quite right since a NULL nexthop is actually fine. These
> nexhops are created for local
The last commit introduced an error in prefix_eligible(). For nexthops the
logic is not quite right since a NULL nexthop is actually fine. These
nexhops are created for local announcements (unless their nexthop is
overridden).
--
:wq Claudio
Index: rde_decide.c
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/03/21(Mon) 11:57, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 05/03/21(Fri) 11:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > >
On 08/03/21(Mon) 11:57, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 05/03/21(Fri) 11:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:19:23 +0100
> > > > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/03/21(Fri) 11:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:19:23 +0100
> > > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > > >
> > > > On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:01, Mark Kettenis
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:07:01AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/03/21(Thu) 10:44, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > single_thread_clear() manipulates the same data structures as
> > single_thread_set() and, as such, doesn't need the KERNEL_LOCK().
> >
> > However cursig() does need some sort of
On 04/03/21(Thu) 10:44, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> single_thread_clear() manipulates the same data structures as
> single_thread_set() and, as such, doesn't need the KERNEL_LOCK().
>
> However cursig() does need some sort of serialization to ensure that
> per-process data structures like signals,
On 05/03/21(Fri) 11:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:19:23 +0100
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > On 04/03/21(Thu) 11:01, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:54:48 +0100
> > > > > From: Patrick
18 matches
Mail list logo
