On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:20:58AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/08/25 19:58, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:02:11PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> > > added.
> > >
> > > Anyone have an
Anton Lindqvist writes:
> As the Consumer Control usages are well defined by the HID Usage Tables
> specification ucc might as well enumerate all of them. Finding an
> appropriate scan code recognized by X11 for each usage is more tricky.
> I've added a few more but the majority are still
On 2021/08/25 19:58, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:02:11PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> > added.
> >
> > Anyone have an idea what the behaviour should be here? For passive
> > would it make sense to
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:02:11PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> added.
>
> Anyone have an idea what the behaviour should be here? For passive
> would it make sense to accept an interface without link-local?
Is there a
On 2021/08/25 13:33, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:02:11 +0100, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> > If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> > added.
> >
> > Anyone have an idea what the behaviour should be here? For passive
> > would it make sense to
Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2021.08.25 22:02:02 +0200:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 08:13:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
> > > using passive to pick up the prefix,
On 25 August 2021 22:02:02 CEST, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 08:13:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
>> On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
>> > using passive to pick up the prefix, i.e.
>>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 08:13:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
> > using passive to pick up the prefix, i.e.
> >
> > interface wg0 { passive }
> >
> > It's failing with
Robert, Sebastien and Stuart,
Thanks for your constructive and postive feedback. Combined with some
off-list (positive) feedback, it suggests this is at least worth
further consideration.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 08:05:37PM +0200, Robert Nagy wrote:
| I am happy to see this. All for it. Did you
On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
> using passive to pick up the prefix, i.e.
>
> interface wg0 { passive }
>
> It's failing with "/etc/ospf6d.conf:10: unnumbered interface wg0".
>
> With -v I get 'interface with
Hi,
I sent this to bugs a while back, but it doesn't seem to have been picked up by
anyone.
On both i386 and amd64, the machine boot command in the bootloader has an off
by one bug, which has been present since revision 1.20 in 1998.
The machine boot command is implemented by patching the
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:02:11 +0100, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> If I manually configure a link-local the interface is successfully
> added.
>
> Anyone have an idea what the behaviour should be here? For passive
> would it make sense to accept an interface without link-local?
I discussed about
Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via ospf6d, just
using passive to pick up the prefix, i.e.
interface wg0 { passive }
It's failing with "/etc/ospf6d.conf:10: unnumbered interface wg0".
With -v I get 'interface with index 27 not found' (this is "normal"
with ospf6d) and the
Hello, All;
I've added a property to CWM config to hide the window in the top
left corner of the screen while moving or resizeing a window.
This is my first patch, so feel free to yell at me.
Ben Raskin
diff --git app/cwm/calmwm.h app/cwm/calmwm.h
index a0aeafa8f..3904eeddf 100644
---
On 2021/08/25 10:35, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > I have a new machine where I'd like to use IPMI. Of course, doing
> > `config -e -f /bsd` will break KARL, so I tried to find a minimal way
> > of supporting this. Done by introducing
Hi
Looks like hkdf.c does not need assert.h so remove it.
Best,
Martin
Index: hkdf/hkdf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libcrypto/hkdf/hkdf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 hkdf.c
--- hkdf/hkdf.c 21 Nov 2019 20:02:20
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> I have a new machine where I'd like to use IPMI. Of course, doing
> `config -e -f /bsd` will break KARL, so I tried to find a minimal way
> of supporting this. Done by introducing a new config file,
> /etc/kernel.conf, which gets
Hi,
As the Consumer Control usages are well defined by the HID Usage Tables
specification ucc might as well enumerate all of them. Finding an
appropriate scan code recognized by X11 for each usage is more tricky.
I've added a few more but the majority are still unmapped. Linux has
defined a couple
18 matches
Mail list logo
