On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 15:18:38 -0600, Joe Nelson wrote:
> I recently discovered the funopen function, and was confused by its
> declaration. Specifically, one of its arguments is
>
> fpos_t (*seekfn)(void *, fpos_t, int)
>
> I wondered how seekfn would be able to return an error code, since
On 25.12.2021. 18:52, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 09:24:07AM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 24.12.2021. 0:55, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>>> I think we can remove the ipsec_in_use workaround now. The IPsec
>>> path is protected with the kernel lock.
>>>
>>> There are some
Prefix life time is independent from router life time.
Form an IPv6 address even if the router announcing the prefix isn't a
default router.
Problem reported by mgraves AT brainfat.net on misc
OK?
diff --git engine.c engine.c
index 81a06cc5528..7a2c11e1bc2 100644
--- engine.c
+++ engine.c
@@
Wait for the link-local address to become non-tentative.
Otherwise we just end up with an ugly "Can't assign requested address"
error from sendmsg(2).
OK?
diff --git frontend.c frontend.c
index b3be6c3fe98..3bbe3656dd3 100644
--- frontend.c
+++ frontend.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct iface {
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
[...]
> I would love to get rid of X509_V_FLAG_IGNORE_CRITICAL and use a callback
> to ensure the right extensions are critical but I never managed to
> understand how the X509_verify_cert() callback actually works.
> Documentation
