sage.
And I think undeadly.org would be more than happy to help spread the word :)
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious ne
r than
the standard ones.
To put it bluntly, what you need is not a new smtpd feature. What you need is
for you to
take the advice given on the opensmptd mailing list: Read the literature others
have pointed
you at, and please consider one or more of the alternative approaches that have
been
On 09/27/17 18:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2,
>> this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants.
>>
>> This diff is als
https://home.nuug.no/~peter/20170927_xdpyinfo_greyhame.txt
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delil
install.
Congratulations on yet another excellent release!
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949
{ smtp
smtps 587 \
imap imaps pop3 pop3s } nat-to $natto_addr
as always, a pfctl -vnf on the config file would show all these things expanded
(yes,
I've been bit by the exact same round-robin problem myself)
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
Yes, the MITM was DPD. Great currier. I recommand it to everyone. NOT!
^courier
the two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive ;)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149
one member, you should be OK.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after
-current, right?
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
correctly AFAICS.
So you should consider this bug closeable.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949
inet6 fe80::250:daff:fe21:cbc9%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet6 2001:16d8:ccbc:dead:beef::1 prefixlen 64
But anyway, with this snapshot I don't need to rewrite the NAT parts of
my tutorial :)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http
out log on $ext_if inet nat-to $ext_addr
restored the config to a working state.
Does this count as a buglet (or something that should be documented, at
least)?
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http
Not the most precise description I see -
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) writes:
match out log on $ext_if inet nat-to ($ext_if)
AFter upgrading, this was loaded as
match out log on $ext_if inet nat-to $ext_addr round-robin
Actually
match out log on $ext_if inet nat-to $ext_if
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org writes:
Please try a newer snapshot, this bug was fixed in the following commit:
Trying a newer snapshot is exactly what I plan to do, no worries
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http
bytes/sector, 30233588 sectors
vscsi0 at root
scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on wd0a (c45f82cf8c94c709.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com
!
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
targets
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949
TouchStrip Fingerprint Sensor rev 1.00/0.33 addr 3
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no
the idea I kinda like it for now.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected
; if you
agree, please make that URL visible via whatever news sites you can
think of (yup, it's in the /. submissions queue).
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set
for the buck.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com writes:
Man, another reason to get my vax up to -current. Sigh. :-)
More idle curiosity than anything else (although I occasionally get
that question myself), how long does a typical vax 'make build' take?
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member
22 matches
Mail list logo