On 2023/10/21 09:31, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
> > relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
> > -current) to bump buffers on them.
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
-current) to bump buffers on them.
Hi Stuart,
Meanwhile I also did some digging and opened a bug at Squid
After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
-current) to bump buffers on them.
On 2023/10/20 13:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> > that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> > processes.
> >
> > After some
On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> processes.
>
> After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.sendspace came up as
>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:09:08PM +0200, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> processes.
>
> After some debugging the limit from
Hi,
Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and
noticed, that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with
multiple worker processes.
After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.sendspace came up as
cause. The 2k default is way to low.
In ktrace I saw
