Re: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-08 Thread Henning Brauer
* Aaron Riekenberg [2016-09-05 13:04]: > Thanks for the explanation. > > I am curious though - is dhclient really the right place to fix this? I > might use some other dhcp client (dhcpcd in ports for example) or some > other application that uses BPF. Should every

Re: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
>I am curious though - is dhclient really the right place to fix this? I >might use some other dhcp client (dhcpcd in ports for example) or some >other application that uses BPF. Should every userland program using BPF >have to worry whether or not it is breaking bridging? Various solutions are

Re: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-05 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
Thanks for the explanation. I am curious though - is dhclient really the right place to fix this? I might use some other dhcp client (dhcpcd in ports for example) or some other application that uses BPF. Should every userland program using BPF have to worry whether or not it is breaking

Re: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-04 Thread Ted Unangst
Aaron Riekenberg wrote: > Based on Martin's hint I tried an experiment - I configured em0 statically > instead of using dhcp. This fixes my problem. > > So to summarize: in 6.0 running dhclient on a bridge-member interface > breaks dhcp traffic passing through the bridge. This worked in 5.9.

Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-04 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
Based on Martin's hint I tried an experiment - I configured em0 statically instead of using dhcp. This fixes my problem. So to summarize: in 6.0 running dhclient on a bridge-member interface breaks dhcp traffic passing through the bridge. This worked in 5.9. Also the FAQ bridge example uses

Fwd: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-04 Thread aaron . riekenberg
Forwarding to tech. On Saturday, 3 September 2016 08:36:43 UTC-5, aaron.ri...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, 3 September 2016 07:15:27 UTC-5, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > Yes something changed. That might be the cause for your regression. > > Sadly your bug report does not contain enough

Re: Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-03 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 09/03/16 13:55, Aaron Riekenberg wrote: I have been using a 5.9 amd64 box with 2 em interfaces configured as a bridge for some time between my ISP's modem/router and my home network. With this setup on 5.9, things worked perfectly. On 6.0 I have tried the same very simple configuration of

Bridge broken in 6.0?

2016-09-03 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
I have been using a 5.9 amd64 box with 2 em interfaces configured as a bridge for some time between my ISP's modem/router and my home network. With this setup on 5.9, things worked perfectly. On 6.0 I have tried the same very simple configuration of creating a bridge with em0 and em1 interfaces